IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v59y2005i03p773-783_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

World Bank Environmental Reform: Revisiting Lessons from Agency Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Gutner, Tamar

Abstract

Daniel Nielson and Michael Tierney's article, “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform” (International Organization, Spring 2003), makes a strong argument for ways in which principal-agent (P-A) models advance theoretical explanations of the behavior and performance of international organizations (IOs). Most IOs suffer from widely recognized gaps between their mandates and their performance, gaps not well explained by the major theories in our field. P-A models are premised on the assumption that performance problems naturally arise when one actor (the principal) delegates to another actor (the agent) the authority to act in the former's interests. The models seek to explain why and how the divergence of interests between the two parties may result in the agent's actions differing from the principal's intentions, how agents may be better controlled, and the costs of doing so.I would like to thank Barbara Connolly, Martha Finnemore, Jeffry Frieden, Dan Guttman, Patrick Jackson, Carmela Lutmar, and Melissa Moye for helpful comments.

Suggested Citation

  • Gutner, Tamar, 2005. "World Bank Environmental Reform: Revisiting Lessons from Agency Theory," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(3), pages 773-783, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:59:y:2005:i:03:p:773-783_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818305050265/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena V McLean, 2015. "A strategic theory of international environmental assistance," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 27(2), pages 324-347, April.
    2. Koch, Martin, 2012. "International Organizations in Development and Global Inequality: The Example of the World Bank's Pension Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series 103, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Martin Koch, 2012. "International Organizations in Development and Global Inequality: the Example of the World Bank's Pension Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-103, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Alexandra Lindenthal & Martin Koch, 2013. "The Bretton Woods Institutions and the Environment: Organizational Learning within the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-36, October.
    5. Marcoux, Christopher & Parks, Bradley C. & Peratsakis, Christian M. & Roberts, J. Timmons & Tierney, Michael J., 2013. "Environmental and Climate Finance in a New World: How Past Environmental Aid Allocation Impacts Future Climate Aid," WIDER Working Paper Series 128, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Christopher Marcoux & Bradley C. Parks & Christian M. Peratsakis & Timmons Roberts & Michael J. Tierney, 2013. "Environmental and Climate Finance in a New World: How Past Environmental Aid Allocation Impacts Future Climate Aid," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-128, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Andonova, Liliana B. & Piselli, Dario, 2022. "Transnational partnerships, domestic institutions, and sustainable development. The case of Brazil and the Amazon Region Protected Areas program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Axel Michaelowa & Katharina Michaelowa, 2011. "Climate business for poverty reduction? The role of the World Bank," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 259-286, September.
    9. Ralph Luken, 2009. "Greening an international organization: UNIDO’s strategic responses," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 159-184, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:59:y:2005:i:03:p:773-783_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.