IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v4y1950i4p639-656_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Social Council

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

The eleventh session of the Economic and Social Council met in Geneva, Switzerland, from July 9 to August 16, 1950. The governments of the Soviet Union, Poland and Czechoslovakia communicated to the Council their refusal to participate in the session in view of the presence of the “representative of the Kuomintang group,” although the Polish representative attended meetings of the Agenda Committee where he sought unsuccessfully to delete from the agenda the consideration of reports of those committees and commissions of the Council covering sessions in which the representatives of the Nationalist Chinese government had participated. Of the 51 items included on the provisional agenda of the session, the Agenda Committee recommended action on all but one, allegations concerning the infringement of trade union rights, an item which was submitted to the International Trade Organization for consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1950. "Economic and Social Council," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 639-656, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:4:y:1950:i:4:p:639-656_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300029477/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin O'Rourke, 2009. "Politics and trade- lessons from past globalisations," Essays and Lectures 265, Bruegel.
    2. Gholiagha, Sassan & Holzscheiter, Anna & Liese, Andrea, 2020. "Activating norm collisions: Interface conflicts in international drug control," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 290-317.
    3. Peter Rodenburg, 2016. "How Full is Full Employment?How Tools and Not Theory Explained Full Employment," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 5-25.
    4. Michael J. Boskin & Marc S. Robinson & Terrance O'Reilly & Praveen Kumar, 1984. "New Estimates of the Value of Federal Mineral Rights and Land," NBER Working Papers 1447, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Tilton, John E., 2013. "The terms of trade debate and the policy implications for primary product producers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 196-203.
    6. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2001. "The Role Of The Public Sector In Technology Development: Generalizations From General Purpose Technologies," Staff Papers 13563, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:4:y:1950:i:4:p:639-656_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.