IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v3y1949i3p518-521_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Court of Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

On April 9, 1949, the International Court of Justice gave its judgment in the Corfu Channel Case. By eleven votes to five the Court gave judgment that the People's Republic of Albania was responsible under international law for the explosions which occurred on October 22, 1946, in Albanian waters and for the damage and loss of life resulting therefrom; by ten votes to six it reserved for further consideration the assessment of the amount of compensation; by fourteen votes to two it gave judgment that the United Kingdom did not violate the sovereignty of Albania by reason of the acts of the British Navy in Albanian waters on October 22, 1946; and it unanimously gave judgment that the acts of the British navy during the course of the minesweeping activities on November 12 and 13, 1946 did constitute violation of the sovereignty of Albania.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1949. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 518-521, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:3:y:1949:i:3:p:518-521_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300014582/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Istrefi Remzije, 2017. "International Security Presence in Kosovo and its Human Rights Implications," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 23(80), pages 131-154, November.
    2. Alistair Rieu-Clarke, 2020. "The duty to take appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm and private companies: insights from transboundary hydropower projects," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 667-682, December.
    3. Owen McIntyre, 2020. "The current state of development of the no significant harm principle: How far have we come?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 601-618, December.
    4. Carrillo-Santarelli Nicolás, 2018. "The Territory Paradox: the Basis of Statehood and International Norms as an Obstacle to the Protection of International Community Interests," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Borys Kormych & Tetiana Averochkina & Vitalii Gaverskyi, 2020. "The public administration of territorial seas: Ukrainian case," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 577-595, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:3:y:1949:i:3:p:518-521_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.