IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v8y2015i02pe1-e4_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imperfect Corrections or Correct Imperfections? Psychometric Corrections in Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Oswald, Frederick L.
  • Ercan, Seydahmet
  • McAbee, Samuel T.
  • Ock, Jisoo
  • Shaw, Amy

Abstract

There is understandable concern by LeBreton, Scherer, and James (2014) that psychometric corrections in organizational research are nothing more than a form of statistical hydraulics. Statistical corrections for measurement error variance and range restriction might inappropriately ratchet observed effects upward into regions of practical significance and publication glory—at the expense of highly questionable results.

Suggested Citation

  • Oswald, Frederick L. & Ercan, Seydahmet & McAbee, Samuel T. & Ock, Jisoo & Shaw, Amy, 2015. "Imperfect Corrections or Correct Imperfections? Psychometric Corrections in Meta-Analysis," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-4, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:8:y:2015:i:02:p:e1-e4_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942615000176/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Codou Samba & Daan Van Knippenberg & C. Chet Miller, 2018. "The impact of strategic dissent on organizational outcomes: A meta‐analytic integration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 379-402, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:8:y:2015:i:02:p:e1-e4_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.