IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v3y2010i04p455-464_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking Workplace Decisions Seriously: This Conversation Has Been Fruitful!

Author

Listed:
  • Bonaccio, Silvia
  • Dalal, Reeshad S.
  • Highhouse, Scott
  • Ilgen, Daniel R.
  • Mohammed, Susan
  • Slaughter, Jerel E.

Abstract

We are gratified by the large number of commentaries to our focal article (Dalal, Bonaccio, et al., 2010) that advocated greater integration of industrial–organizational psychology and organizational behavior (IOOB) with the field of judgment and decision making (JDM). The commentaries were uniformly constructive and civil. Our disagreements with the commentaries are mild and are limited primarily to the roles of external validity, internal validity, and laboratory experiments in IOOB. For the majority of our response, we attempt to build on the views expressed in the commentaries and to articulate some thoughts regarding the future. We structure our response according to the following themes: barriers to cross-fertilization between IOOB and JDM, areas of existing and potential JDM-to-IOOB cross-fertilization, areas of potential IOOB-to-JDM cross-fertilization, and ways to increase (and ideally institutionalize) cross-fertilization. We hope our focal article and our response to the commentaries will help to ignite exciting basic research and important practical applications associated with decision making in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonaccio, Silvia & Dalal, Reeshad S. & Highhouse, Scott & Ilgen, Daniel R. & Mohammed, Susan & Slaughter, Jerel E., 2010. "Taking Workplace Decisions Seriously: This Conversation Has Been Fruitful!," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 455-464, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:3:y:2010:i:04:p:455-464_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942600003692/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:3:y:2010:i:04:p:455-464_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.