IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v2y2009i02p201-204_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenberg Doth Protest Too Much: Application Always Has Been, and Victims and Morality Always Will Be Critical for Advancing Organizational Justice Research

Author

Listed:
  • Barclay, Laurie J.
  • Skarlicki, Daniel P.
  • Latham, Gary P.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Barclay, Laurie J. & Skarlicki, Daniel P. & Latham, Gary P., 2009. "Greenberg Doth Protest Too Much: Application Always Has Been, and Victims and Morality Always Will Be Critical for Advancing Organizational Justice Research," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 201-204, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:2:y:2009:i:02:p:201-204_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S175494260000136X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Marion Fortin, 2014. "One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 435-451, October.
    2. David B. Whiteside & Laurie J. Barclay, 2016. "The Face of Fairness: Self-Awareness as a Means to Promote Fairness among Managers with Low Empathy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 721-730, September.
    3. Laurie J. Barclay & Maria Francisca Saldanha, 2016. "Facilitating Forgiveness in Organizational Contexts: Exploring the Injustice Gap, Emotions, and Expressive Writing Interventions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 699-720, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:2:y:2009:i:02:p:201-204_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.