IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v13y2020i2p117-136_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coffee and controversy: How applied psychology can revitalize sexual harassment and racial discrimination training

Author

Listed:
  • Hayes, Theodore L.
  • Kaylor, Leah E.
  • Oltman, Kathleen A.

Abstract

Training has shown little effectiveness in altering harassing or discriminatory behavior. Limitations of prior intervention efforts may reflect poor conceptualization of the problems involved, poor training intervention design, approaches that engender cynicism, or misunderstanding psychological principles of attitude and behavior change. Interventions should capitalize on behavioral science models and tools at multiple levels from a broad array of disciplines to explain harassment and bias, and then to defeat these behaviors. Measures to ensure fair treatment should focus on leadership socialization, organizational culture and climate, increased professional competence, and integration with organizational approaches to corporate social responsibility and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayes, Theodore L. & Kaylor, Leah E. & Oltman, Kathleen A., 2020. "Coffee and controversy: How applied psychology can revitalize sexual harassment and racial discrimination training," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 117-136, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:117-136_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942619000841/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atwater, Leanne E. & Sturm, Rachel E. & Taylor, Scott N. & Tringale, Allison, 2021. "The era of #MeToo and what managers should do about it," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 307-318.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:117-136_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.