IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v12y2019i3p215-233_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management

Author

Listed:
  • Balzer, William K.
  • Brodke, Michelle H.
  • Kluse, Christopher
  • Zickar, Michael J.

Abstract

Lean management and related ideas have had a significant impact on organizations throughout North America and the world. Despite its popularity and impact, I-O psychologists have largely neglected Lean as a research topic and few I-O psychologists engage in applied practice in the area. In this focal article, we provide a working definition of Lean and present examples of Lean’s influence. Next, we outline possible reasons to explain I-O psychologists’ indifference to Lean. Finally, we provide some topic areas that I-O psychologists can use to contribute to the Lean literature. By using I-O psychologists’ skill in measurement and evaluation, along with our considerable organizational theory, we believe that I-O psychology can improve Lean and broaden their impact. We hope this focal article will inspire I-O psychologists to reconsider a research and practice area that they have previously ignored. In addition, we hope that this article causes I-O psychologists to reflect on their role to play in addressing popular management trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Balzer, William K. & Brodke, Michelle H. & Kluse, Christopher & Zickar, Michael J., 2019. "Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 215-233, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:215-233_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942619000233/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antony Pearce & Dirk Pons & Thomas Neitzert, 2023. "Understanding Lean—Statistical Analysis of Perceptions and Self-Deception Regarding Lean Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-43, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:215-233_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.