IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v11y2018i03p369-388_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Are We Doing? An Examination of Gender Representation in Industrial and Organizational (I-O) Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Gardner, Danielle M.
  • Ryan, Ann Marie
  • Snoeyink, Megan

Abstract

There has been an explosion of within-profession studies examining standings on gender representation in advancement, publication patterns, and conference presentations. However, industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology has yet to take such an introspective look and fully join these conversations. This manuscript aims to initiate and encourage such discussion. Through a brief review of relevant background information and the collection and analysis of recent archival data, we seek to examine where we have been with regard to gender representation, where we currently stand, and what steps are needed moving forward. We aim to stimulate continued examinations on this topic while recommending appropriate action items relevant to achieving equity in representation in our field.

Suggested Citation

  • Gardner, Danielle M. & Ryan, Ann Marie & Snoeyink, Megan, 2018. "How Are We Doing? An Examination of Gender Representation in Industrial and Organizational (I-O) Psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 369-388, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:369-388_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942618000044/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nida ul Habib Bajwa & Cornelius J. König, 2019. "How much is research in the top journals of industrial/organizational psychology dominated by authors from the U.S.?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1147-1161, September.
    2. Dengsheng Wu & Xiaoli Lu & Jianping Li & Jing Li, 2020. "Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1579-1597, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:369-388_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.