IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v14y2019i04p468-486_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of the type of social health insurance on health service utilisation and expenditures: implications for a unified system in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Si Ying
  • Wu, Xun
  • Yang, Wei

Abstract

While moving towards unified social health insurance (SHI) is often a politically popular policy reform in countries where rapid expansion in health insurance coverage has given rise to the segmentation of SHI systems as different SHI schemes were rolled out to serve different populations, the potential impacts of reform on service utilisation and health costs have not been systematically studied. Using data from the Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we compared the mean costs incurred for both inpatient and outpatient care under different health insurance schemes, and the impact of different SHI schemes on treatment utilisation and health care costs using a two-part model. Our results show that Urban Employee Medical Insurance, which offers the most generous benefits, incurs the highest total costs prior to reimbursement when compared to other SHI schemes. Our analysis also shows that utilisation of SHI did not show significant reduction in out-of-pocket payments for outpatients. We argue that, unless effective measures are introduced to deal with perverse provider payment incentives, the move towards a unified system with more generous benefits may usher in a new wave of cost escalation for health care systems in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Si Ying & Wu, Xun & Yang, Wei, 2019. "Impacts of the type of social health insurance on health service utilisation and expenditures: implications for a unified system in China," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 468-486, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:14:y:2019:i:04:p:468-486_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S174413311800018X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Chen & Miaoting Cheng, 2022. "Exploring Chinese Elderly’s Trust in the Healthcare System: Empirical Evidence from a Population-Based Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Guangsheng Wan & Zixuan Peng & Yufeng Shi & Peter C. Coyte, 2020. "What Are the Determinants of the Decision to Purchase Private Health Insurance in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Wanyue Dong & Anthony B. Zwi & Ruhai Bai & Chi Shen & Jianmin Gao, 2021. "Benefits Associated with China’s Social Health Insurance Schemes: Trend Analysis and Associated Factors Since Health Reform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Sha Chen & Zhiye Lin & Xiaoru Fan & Jushuang Li & Yao-Jie Xie & Chun Hao, 2022. "The Comparison of Various Types of Health Insurance in the Healthcare Utilization, Costs and Catastrophic Health Expenditures among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. He, Wen, 2023. "Social medical insurance integration and health care disparities in China: Evidence from an administrative claim dataset," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 20-39.
    6. Si Shi & Yawen Jiang, 2022. "Does supplemental private health insurance incentivize household risky financial asset investment? Evidence from the China Household Financial Survey," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 369-421, December.
    7. Nie, Peng & Li, Qiaoge, 2022. "Energy Poverty and Health Care Expenditures: Evidence from the China Family Panel Studies," IZA Discussion Papers 15479, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:14:y:2019:i:04:p:468-486_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.