IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v35y2019i04p729-776_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Regression Monotonicity In Econometric Models

Author

Listed:
  • Chetverikov, Denis

Abstract

Monotonicity is a key qualitative prediction of a wide array of economic models derived via robust comparative statics. It is therefore important to design effective and practical econometric methods for testing this prediction in empirical analysis. This article develops a general nonparametric framework for testing monotonicity of a regression function. Using this framework, a broad class of new tests is introduced, which gives an empirical researcher a lot of flexibility to incorporate ex ante information she might have. The article also develops new methods for simulating critical values, which are based on the combination of a bootstrap procedure and new selection algorithms. These methods yield tests that have correct asymptotic size and are asymptotically nonconservative. It is also shown how to obtain an adaptive and rate optimal test that has the best attainable rate of uniform consistency against models whose regression function has Lipschitz-continuous first-order derivatives and that automatically adapts to the unknown smoothness of the regression function. Simulations show that the power of the new tests in many cases significantly exceeds that of some prior tests, e.g., that of Ghosal, Sen, and Van der Vaart (2000).

Suggested Citation

  • Chetverikov, Denis, 2019. "Testing Regression Monotonicity In Econometric Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 729-776, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:35:y:2019:i:04:p:729-776_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466618000282/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng Fang & Juwon Seo, 2021. "A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions That Form Convex Cones," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2439-2458, September.
    2. Yoichi Arai & Taisuke Otsu & Mengshan Xu, 2022. "GLS under Monotone Heteroskedasticity," Papers 2210.13843, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. Komarova, Tatiana & Hidalgo, Javier, 2023. "Testing nonparametric shape restrictions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121410, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Yu Zhu, 2020. "Inference in nonparametric/semiparametric moment equality models with shape restrictions," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), pages 609-636, May.
    5. Athey, Susan & Imbens, Guido W. & Metzger, Jonas & Munro, Evan, 2024. "Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the design of Monte Carlo simulations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    6. Marina Friedrich & Eric Beutner & Hanno Reuvers & Stephan Smeekes & Jean-Pierre Urbain & Whitney Bader & Bruno Franco & Bernard Lejeune & Emmanuel Mahieu, 2020. "A statistical analysis of time trends in atmospheric ethane," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 105-125, September.
    7. Nir Billfeld & Moshe Kim, 2024. "Context-dependent Causality (the Non-Nonotonic Case)," Papers 2404.05021, arXiv.org.
    8. Dewan, Ambuj & Neligh, Nathaniel, 2020. "Estimating information cost functions in models of rational inattention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Henry, Marc & Méango, Romuald & Mourifié, Ismaël, 2024. "Role models and revealed gender-specific costs of STEM in an extended Roy model of major choice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    10. Babii, Andrii & Kumar, Rohit, 2023. "Isotonic regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 371-393.
    11. Yu-Chin Hsu & Martin Huber & Ying-Ying Lee & Chu-An Liu, 2021. "Testing Monotonicity of Mean Potential Outcomes in a Continuous Treatment with High-Dimensional Data," Papers 2106.04237, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    12. Zheng Fang & Juwon Seo, 2019. "A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions That Form Convex Cones," Papers 1910.07689, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    13. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Kengo Kato & Yuta Koike, 2019. "Improved Central Limit Theorem and bootstrap approximations in high dimensions," Papers 1912.10529, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    14. Tatiana Komarova & Javier Hidalgo, 2019. "Testing nonparametric shape restrictions," Papers 1909.01675, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    15. Christoph Breunig & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "Adaptive, Rate-Optimal Hypothesis Testing in Nonparametric IV Models," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2238R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Dec 2021.
    16. Zheng Fang, 2021. "A Unifying Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions," Papers 2107.12494, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    17. Yu‐Chin Hsu & Shu Shen, 2021. "Testing monotonicity of conditional treatment effects under regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 346-366, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:35:y:2019:i:04:p:729-776_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.