IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v21y2005i06p1087-1111_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity Of The Sampling Window Method For Long-Range Dependent Linear Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Nordman, Daniel J.
  • Lahiri, Soumendra N.

Abstract

The sampling window method of Hall, Jing, and Lahiri (1998, Statistica Sinica 8, 1189–1204) is known to consistently estimate the distribution of the sample mean for a class of long-range dependent processes, generated by transformations of Gaussian time series. This paper shows that the same nonparametric subsampling method is also valid for an entirely different category of long-range dependent series that are linear with possibly non-Gaussian innovations. For these strongly dependent time processes, subsampling confidence intervals allow inference on the process mean without knowledge of the underlying innovation distribution or the long-memory parameter. The finite-sample coverage accuracy of the subsampling method is examined through a numerical study.The authors thank two referees for comments and suggestions that greatly improved an earlier draft of the paper. This research was partially supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants DMS 00-72571 and DMS 03-06574 and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 475).

Suggested Citation

  • Nordman, Daniel J. & Lahiri, Soumendra N., 2005. "Validity Of The Sampling Window Method For Long-Range Dependent Linear Processes," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(6), pages 1087-1111, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:21:y:2005:i:06:p:1087-1111_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466605050541/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hwai-Chung Ho, 2007. "Estimation errors of the Sharpe ratio for long-memory stochastic volatility models," Papers math/0702812, arXiv.org.
    2. Ting Zhang & Hwai-Chung Ho & Martin Wendler & Wei Biao Wu, 2013. "Block Sampling under Strong Dependence," Papers 1312.5807, arXiv.org.
    3. Zhang, Ting & Ho, Hwai-Chung & Wendler, Martin & Wu, Wei Biao, 2013. "Block sampling under strong dependence," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 123(6), pages 2323-2339.
    4. Daniel J. Nordman & Philipp Sibbertsen & Soumendra N. Lahiri, 2007. "Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the mean of a long‐range dependent process," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 576-599, July.
    5. Bai, Shuyang & Taqqu, Murad S. & Zhang, Ting, 2016. "A unified approach to self-normalized block sampling," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(8), pages 2465-2493.
    6. Chang, Jinyuan & Qiu, Yumou & Yao, Qiwei & Zou, Tao, 2018. "Confidence regions for entries of a large precision matrix," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 57-82.
    7. Chang, Jinyuan & Qiu, Yumou & Yao, Qiwei & Zou, Tao, 2018. "Confidence regions for entries of a large precision matrix," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87513, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Kim, Young Min & Nordman, Daniel J., 2013. "A frequency domain bootstrap for Whittle estimation under long-range dependence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 405-420.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:21:y:2005:i:06:p:1087-1111_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.