IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v25y2024i2p592-626_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Internationalization of the Newspaper Industry 1989–2002: Three Scandinavian Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Lakomaa, Erik
  • Wahlund, Richard

Abstract

In the 1990s, three Scandinavian news media companies, Bonnier, Kinnevik, and Schibsted, internationalized their newspapers. Despite doing this during the same period, competing in the same industry and institutional environment, being exposed to the same opportunities by the opening of the Eastern European markets, and all belonging to a smaller language area, they differed in their internationalization models as well as in their outcomes. Despite initial successes, Bonnier and Kinnevik eventually discontinued their newspapers in the new markets, in many cases following significant losses, while Schibsted fared better. The main explanation for using different internationalization models was differences in business models, basically striving to do business internationally in a similar way as domestically. That is, they did not choose a specific internationalization model but sought to simply expand their business models internationally. Consequently, this article finds that when researching internationalization, more focus should be placed on business models.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakomaa, Erik & Wahlund, Richard, 2024. "The Internationalization of the Newspaper Industry 1989–2002: Three Scandinavian Cases," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 592-626, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:25:y:2024:i:2:p:592-626_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S146722272300006X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:25:y:2024:i:2:p:592-626_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.