IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buspol/v21y2019i4p464-486_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From market multilateralism to governance by goal setting: SDGs and the changing role of partnerships in a new global order

Author

Listed:
  • Bull, Benedicte
  • McNeill, Desmond

Abstract

Business has been involved in cooperation with multilateral organizations through public-private partnerships (PPPs) since the late 1990s. With their adoption of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), multilateral institutions increasingly consider partnerships as a means to achieve their goals given their own limited implementation capacity. However, the global economic order has changed significantly since the first expansion of PPPs, particularly due to growing participation by non-western states and companies. This article asks how this shift has changed the eagerness to form partnerships, as well as their qualitative content. It analyzes the 3964 partnerships in the SDG partnership registry, focusing on the subset of them that includes business partners. We divide these into five groups: local implementation, resource mobilization, advocacy, policy, and operational partnerships. We study PPPs involving companies from different varieties of capitalism—private, market based forms, and state-led forms of capitalism. We find that PPPs are still dominated by companies and other actors from Western countries. Moreover, business participate more in U.S.- and Canadian-led partnerships than others. We also find strong differences regarding what category of PPPs that companies from different backgrounds engage in, and discuss the linkages between varieties of capitalism and PPP participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bull, Benedicte & McNeill, Desmond, 2019. "From market multilateralism to governance by goal setting: SDGs and the changing role of partnerships in a new global order," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 464-486, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:21:y:2019:i:4:p:464-486_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1469356919000090/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halkos, George & Gkampoura, Eleni-Christina, 2021. "Reviewing the 17 Sustainable Development Goals: Importance and Progress," MPRA Paper 105329, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 2021. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-57, March.
    3. Magdalena Bexell, 2024. "Indicator accountability or policy shrinking? Multistakeholder partnerships in reviews of the sustainable development goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 276-287, May.
    4. Walter Leal Filho & Tony Wall & Jelena Barbir & Gabriela Nagle Alverio & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Julianna Ramirez, 2022. "Relevance of international partnerships in the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, December.
    5. Erola Palau-Pinyana & Josep Llach & Llorenç Bagur-Femenías, 2024. "Mapping enablers for SDG implementation in the private sector: a systematic literature review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1559-1588, September.
    6. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 0. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    7. Marcel T. J. Kok & Kathrin Ludwig, 2022. "Understanding international non-state and subnational actors for biodiversity and their possible contributions to the post-2020 CBD global biodiversity framework: insights from six international coope," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Manuel Brunner & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2022. "The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Halkos, George & Gkampoura, Eleni-Christina, 2021. "Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? An overview on progress," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:21:y:2019:i:4:p:464-486_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.