IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v49y1975i02p184-204_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Accounting in an Early Integrated Industrial: E. I. duPont de Nemours Powder Company, 1903-1912

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, H. Thomas

Abstract

The appearance of large, integrated industrial firms at the turn of the century encouraged the introduction of innovative accounting practices. Professor Johnson examines the centralized management accounting system that made it possible for one such firm, the DuPont Powder Co., to plan its long-term development and to avoid the internal inefficiency that sometimes accompanies enormous size.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, H. Thomas, 1975. "Management Accounting in an Early Integrated Industrial: E. I. duPont de Nemours Powder Company, 1903-1912," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 184-204, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:49:y:1975:i:02:p:184-204_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680500032633/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carnegie, Garry D. & McBride, Karen M. & Napier, Christopher J. & Parker, Lee D., 2020. "Accounting history and theorising about organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    2. Lamia Berrah & Vincent Cliville & Damien Trentesaux & Claude Chapel, 2021. "Industrial Performance: An Evolution Incorporating Ethics in the Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. L. Berrah & V. Clivillé & J. Montmain & G. Mauris, 2019. "The Contribution concept for the control of a manufacturing multi-criteria performance improvement," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 47-58, January.
    4. Jaroslav Wagner, 2011. "Měření výkonnosti - vývojové tendence 2. poloviny 20. století [Performance Measurement - Developing Tendencies of the Second Half of the 20th Century]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(6), pages 775-793.
    5. Wuzhao Xue & Hua Li & Rizwan Ali & Ramiz Ur Rehman, 2020. "Knowledge Mapping of Corporate Financial Performance Research: A Visual Analysis Using Cite Space and Ucinet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    6. E. Grifell-Tatjé & C. Lovell, 2014. "Productivity, price recovery, capacity constraints and their financial consequences," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 3-17, February.
    7. C. A. K. Lovell, 2016. "Recent Developments in Productivity Analysis," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 417-444, October.
    8. Hofmann, Thorsten, 2011. "Balanced Scorecard: Theoretische Konzeption und Anwendung in der Praxis," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 4/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.
    9. Bryer, Rob, 2013. "Americanism and financial accounting theory – Part 2: The ‘modern business enterprise’, America's transition to capitalism, and the genesis of management accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 273-318.
    10. Richardson, Alan J. & Kilfoyle, Eksa, 2009. "Accounting in markets, hierarchies and networks: The role of accounting in the transnational governance of postal transactions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 939-956, November.
    11. Margaret Levenstein, 1991. "The Use of Cost Measures: The Dow Chemical Company, 1890-1914," NBER Chapters, in: Inside the Business Enterprise: Historical Perspectives on the Use of Information, pages 71-116, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Trevor Boyns & Mark Matthews & John Edwards, 2004. "The development of costing in the British chemical industry, c.1870-c.1940," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 3-24.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:49:y:1975:i:02:p:184-204_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.