IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v11y2001i02p365-371_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of Management Morality for the New Millennium

Author

Listed:
  • Carroll, Archie B.

Abstract

This paper is the presidential address to the Society for Business Ethics presented during its annual meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on August 7, 1999. The paper discusses three models of management morality and considers their applicability for thinking about business ethics in the new millennium. The moral management model, in particular, is discussed in contrast to the moral market model, which was presented in the previous year’s presidential address by John Boatright. Immoral Management, Moral Management, and Amoral Management are considered and two hypotheses about the presence of amorality within the management population and individual managers are reflected upon.

Suggested Citation

  • Carroll, Archie B., 2001. "Models of Management Morality for the New Millennium," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 365-371, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:11:y:2001:i:02:p:365-371_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00001408/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esi Marius Costel, 2018. "The Pragmatic Nature Of The Relationship Between Identity, Culture And Business Mission: An Approach In The Strategic Management Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 40-46, February.
    2. Ye Cai & Hoje Jo & Carrie Pan, 2012. "Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 467-480, July.
    3. Fahri Karakas & Emine Sarigollu, 2012. "Benevolent Leadership: Conceptualization and Construct Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 537-553, July.
    4. Dennis J. Marquardt & Lee Warren Brown & Wendy J. Casper, 2018. "Ethical Leadership Perceptions: Does It Matter If You’re Black or White?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 599-612, September.
    5. Pan, Xiaozhen & Tang, Hongfei, 2021. "Are both managerial morality and talent important to firm performance? Evidence from Chinese public firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Matthew Sinnicks, 2018. "Leadership After Virtue: MacIntyre’s Critique of Management Reconsidered," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 735-746, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:11:y:2001:i:02:p:365-371_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.