IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v10y2000i02p497-520_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral Values: Situationally Defined Individual Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Scott, Elizabeth D.

Abstract

This article suggests that there are individual differences in how people define important moral values, and that these differences are made manifest in differences in the situations. It identifies five dimensions along which individuals can differ in their understandings of values: 1) value category (where the value lies in the hierarchy), 2) agent (how voluntary the action is and whether it is morally required of the agent), 3) object (how close the self is to the object of the action; whether the action offends God) 4) effect (whether the effect of the action is to harm or help), and 5) intention (whether the intention of the action is to harm or help). It then addresses four important values entailing moral dimensions: respect for life, respect for property, honest communication, and respect for religion. The article suggests that empirical research, classroom teaching, and business practice can be strengthened by considering these dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott, Elizabeth D., 2000. "Moral Values: Situationally Defined Individual Differences," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 497-520, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:10:y:2000:i:02:p:497-520_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00000841/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding-Yu Jiang & Yi-Chen Lin & Lin-Chin Lin, 2011. "Business Moral Values of Supervisors and Subordinates and Their Effect on Employee Effectiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(2), pages 239-252, May.
    2. Chris Perryer & Brenda Scott-Ladd, 2014. "Deceit, Misuse and Favours: Understanding and Measuring Attitudes to Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 123-134, April.
    3. Mehmet Fatih Yigit, 2016. "Citizenship Perceptions of University Students," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-40, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:10:y:2000:i:02:p:497-520_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.