IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v15y1985i03p299-328_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucrats, Budgets and the Growth of the State: Reconstructing an Instrumental Model

Author

Listed:
  • Dunleavy, Patrick

Abstract

This article forms part of a longer-term project dealing with the impact of public choice theories in political science. The focus here is on economic models of bureaucracy, which despite their increasing theoretical significance and influence on practical politics have heretofore been little analysed, except by their exponents. I have argued elsewhere that amongst existing public choice accounts there are two seminal works, Antony Downs's pluralist treatment in Inside Bureaucracy and William Niskanen's new right thesis in Bureaucracy and Representative Government. The central innovation of economic approaches is their stress on rational officials' attachment to budget maximization strategies. In Downs's case this is a finite maximand limited by bureaucrats' conservatism and other motivations. But in Niskanen's case budget maximization is an open-ended process, constrained only by external limits on agencies' abilities to push up their budgets. None the less, despite their disparate approaches and conclusions, both these books share four failings common to almost all other public choice work in the field:(1) They operate with vague and ill-defined definitions of bureaucrats' utility functions.(2) They assume that all bureaucracies are hierarchical line agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dunleavy, Patrick, 1985. "Bureaucrats, Budgets and the Growth of the State: Reconstructing an Instrumental Model," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 299-328, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:15:y:1985:i:03:p:299-328_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712340000421X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Indrani Roy Chowdhury & Prabal Roy Chowdhury, 2018. "Public-private Partnerships, Commitment and X-Inefficiency," Discussion Papers 18-04, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    2. Tyrone M. Carlin & Cuong Duc Pham, 2009. "From Public To Private: Evidence From a Transitional Economy Setting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(3), pages 207-216, September.
    3. Laurence E. Lynn, 1994. "Public management research: The triumph of art over science," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 231-259.
    4. Benito Arruñada, 2020. "The organization of public registries: A comparative analysis," Economics Working Papers 1695, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Sep 2021.
    5. Hugh Jones, David, 2011. "How to Waste a Crisis: Budget Cuts and Public Service Reform," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 51, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    6. David Hugh-Jones, 2014. "Why do crises go to waste? Fiscal austerity and public service reform," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 209-220, January.
    7. Barr, Nicholas, 1992. "Economic theory and the welfare state : a survey and interpretation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 279, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Rosen Valchev & Antony Davies, 2009. "Transparency, Performance, and Agency Budgets: A Rational Expectations Modeling Approach," Working Papers 2009-004, The George Washington University, Department of Economics, H. O. Stekler Research Program on Forecasting.
    9. Indrani Roy Chowdhury & Prabal Roy Chowdhury, 2018. "Public–Private Partnerships, Commitment and X-Inefficiency," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(2), pages 157-167, December.
    10. Hood, Christopher, 1995. "The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 93-109.
    11. Mogues, Tewodaj, 2012. "What determines public expenditure allocations?: A review of theories, and implications for agricultural public investments," IFPRI discussion papers 1216, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:15:y:1985:i:03:p:299-328_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.