IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v82y1988i04p1129-1152_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Maintenance and the Retention Decision in Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Rothenberg, Lawrence S.

Abstract

Understanding why members leave or remain in groups has received little attention despite its fundamental importance for organizational maintenance. In this analysis, a theory of experiential search is proposed and applied to Common Cause. Group participation is conceptualized as a process by which imperfectly informed decision makers learn about the organizations they join. This framework makes quitting understandable and provides a link between the initial membership choice and follow-up decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rothenberg, Lawrence S., 1988. "Organizational Maintenance and the Retention Decision in Groups," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(4), pages 1129-1152, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:82:y:1988:i:04:p:1129-1152_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400196364/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbieri, Stefano & Mattozzi, Andrea, 2009. "Membership in citizen groups," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 217-232, September.
    2. Vjollca Sadiraj & Jan Tuinstra & Frans Winden, 2005. "Interest group size dynamics and policymaking," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 271-303, December.
    3. Robert Lowry, 1998. "Religion and the demand for membership in environmental citizen groups," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 223-240, March.
    4. Robert Newbery & Matthew Gorton & Jeremy Phillipson & Jane Atterton, 2016. "Sustaining business networks: Understanding the benefit bundles sought by members of local business associations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1267-1283, November.
    5. Jae Yun Moon & Lee S. Sproull, 2008. "The Role of Feedback in Managing the Internet-Based Volunteer Work Force," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 494-515, December.
    6. Tim Wegenast, 2010. "Uninformed Voters for Sale: Electoral Competition, Information and Interest Groups in the US," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 271-300, May.
    7. Paul Edward Johnson, 1990. "Unraveling in Democratically Governed Groups," Rationality and Society, , vol. 2(1), pages 4-34, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:82:y:1988:i:04:p:1129-1152_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.