IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v53y2024i1p185-207_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable energy prosocial behavior, is it source dependent?

Author

Listed:
  • Katare, Bhagyashree
  • Wang, H. Holly
  • Wetzstein, Michael
  • Jiang, Yu
  • Weiland, Brandon

Abstract

Facing increasing nonrenewable and environmental concerns with fossil power generation, renewable energy is being supported by government mechanisms. With the power generation cost of renewables generally higher than fossil fuels, determining the optimal level of these mechanisms requires an understanding of households’ prosocial behavior toward renewables. The issue is determining the magnitude households are willing to pay (WTP) for alternative renewables. Our hypothesis is this behavior varies by the type of renewable energy. As a test of this hypothesis, we apply a discrete choice experiment to measure households’ WTP. Results support our hypothesis with a positive WTP for solar energy, leading to a 62% reduction in solar subsidy, and a negative WTP for biomass and wind sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Katare, Bhagyashree & Wang, H. Holly & Wetzstein, Michael & Jiang, Yu & Weiland, Brandon, 2024. "Renewable energy prosocial behavior, is it source dependent?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 185-207, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:53:y:2024:i:1:p:185-207_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280523000369/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:53:y:2024:i:1:p:185-207_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.