IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cub/journl/v27y2024i1p55-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived favourability of human resource practices and job engagement: A mediated moderated model of justice perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel EYAMU

    (Kyambogo University)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate how the perceived favourability of human resource practices, resulting from the uneven distribution of HR practices, influences job engagement with perceived distributive justice as a mediator, while also considering the moderating influence of perceived procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice on the link between perceived distributive justice and job engagement. Aims(s) – This research aims to examine the effect of perceived favourability of HR practices on job engagement. It also assesses the mediating role of distributive justice on the relationship between the perceived favourability of HR practices and job engagement. Furthermore, it explores the moderating role of perceived procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice on the relationship between distributive justice and job engagement. Design/methodology/approach – The research involves a quantitative approach, collecting data from 733 employees across various Australian industry sectors through self-reports. The data were analysed using SPSS version 23 and Hayes’ process. Findings – The findings revealed that perceived distributive justice partially mediates the relationship between the perceived favourability of HR practices and job engagement. Additionally, perceived procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice positively moderate the link between distributive justice and job engagement. Limitations of the study – The study only considers individual-level perceptions of HR practices’ favourability. Subsequent investigations may explore individual and inter-group differences in HR practices within a single study, providing additional understanding of how employees may react to differential treatment. Practical implications – Organisations should take into account procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice, in addition to fair HR practices, to enhance job engagement in the context of HR differentiation. Originality/value – This research provides new insights into how social comparisons arising from HR differentiation influence job engagement by focusing on individual-level responses and introducing a justice-oriented approach. It also proposes a novel mediated-moderated model.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel EYAMU, 2024. "Perceived favourability of human resource practices and job engagement: A mediated moderated model of justice perceptions," Journal of Human Resource Management, Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(1), pages 55-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:cub:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:55-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jhrm.eu/55-perceived-favourability-of-human-resource-practices-and-job-engagement-a-mediated-moderated-model-of-justice-perceptions/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    human resource differentiation; human resource practices; job engagement; organisational justice; social comparison;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cub:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:55-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Lasakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkomsk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.