IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cta/jcppxx/2206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Romanian population’s access to education during 1990-2010

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Livia Stefanescu

Abstract

In the present article, we will analyze the thematics QAFE, which means the Romanian population’s access to the desired forms of education during 1990-2010. The data used in the current study represent the answers of the Romanians to the question QAFE present in 13 representative samples at national level (the database DQLR-RIQL). Concretely, we will use categorial data of ordinal type. We intend to create a classification of the years from the period 1990-2010, from the point of view of the QAFE problematics. In this way, in a first approach we have used the partial relation “ £os “  of stochastic order which applies to ordinal categorial variables. We have extended the analysis on the thematics QAFE by proposing the indicator PSA of “progress” in order to create a hierarchy of the years from the period 1990-2010 with regard to Romanians’ perception on the aforementionned aspect. The present study shows a permanent change of Romanians’opinions regarding their access to the current forms of education. Among other causes, this aspect is generated by the lack of coherence in the promotion in the educational system from Romania of educational policies that are stable and efficient in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Livia Stefanescu, 2020. "The Romanian population’s access to education during 1990-2010," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 2, pages 92-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:cta:jcppxx:2206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jppc.ro/index.php/jppc/article/download/373/328
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buhong Zheng, 2007. "Inequality orderings and unit consistency," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 29(3), pages 515-538, October.
    2. Michel Le Breton & Eugenio Peluso, 2009. "Third-degree stochastic dominance and inequality measurement," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 7(3), pages 249-268, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Erreygers & Roselinde Kessels, 2017. "Socioeconomic Status and Health: A New Approach to the Measurement of Bivariate Inequality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Raymond H. Chan & Ephraim Clark & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "New development on the third-order stochastic dominance for risk-averse and risk-seeking investors with application in risk management," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 108-132, June.
    3. David Lander & David Gunawan & William Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2020. "Bayesian assessment of Lorenz and stochastic dominance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 767-799, May.
    4. Coral Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2010. "New unit-consistent intermediate inequality indices," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(3), pages 505-521, March.
    5. Chan, Raymond H. & Clark, Ephraim & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2012. "On the Third Order Stochastic Dominance for Risk-Averse and Risk-Seeking Investors," MPRA Paper 42676, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Gayant, Jean-Pascal & Le Pape, Nicolas, 2017. "Increasing Nth degree inequality," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 185-189.
    7. Osnat Peled & Jacques Silber, 2021. "On the Measurement of Relative, Absolute and Intermediate Pro-middle Class Growth," Research on Economic Inequality, in: Research on Economic Inequality: Poverty, Inequality and Shocks, volume 29, pages 139-167, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    8. Florent Bresson & Kelly Labar, 2007. "“Leftist”, “Rightist” and Intermediate Decompositions of Poverty: Variations with an Application to China from 1990 to 2003," Working Papers 76, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    9. Chan, Raymond H. & Clark, Ephraim & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2016. "On the Third Order Stochastic Dominance for Risk-Averse and Risk-Seeking Investors with Analysis of their Traditional and Internet Stocks," MPRA Paper 75002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ma Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ana Urrutia & Henar Díez, 2010. "Unit Consistency And Bipolarization Of Income Distributions," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(1), pages 65-83, March.
    11. Aaberge, Rolf & Havnes, Tarjei & Mogstad, Magne, 2013. "A Theory for Ranking Distribution Functions," IZA Discussion Papers 7738, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Florent Bresson & Jean-Yves Duclos, 2015. "Intertemporal poverty comparisons," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(3), pages 567-616, March.
    13. David Gunawan & William E. Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2020. "Posterior Probabilities for Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance of Australian Income Distributions," Papers 2005.04870, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    14. Beckman, Steve & James Smith, W. & Zheng, Buhong, 2009. "Measuring inequality with interval data," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 25-34, July.
    15. Eugenio Peluso & Alain Trannoy, 2012. "Preserving dominance relations through disaggregation: the evil and the saint," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 633-647, July.
    16. David Gunawan & William E. Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2021. "Posterior Probabilities for Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance of Australian Income Distributions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 97(319), pages 504-524, December.
    17. Francesco Andreoli, 2018. "Robust Inference for Inverse Stochastic Dominance," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 146-159, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cta:jcppxx:2206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ene Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jppc.ro/?lang=en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.