IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/020631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actitudes emprendedoras de estudiantes universitarios: caso de una institución de educación superior en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Miranda, Oscar Mauricio Gómez

    (Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior)

Abstract

El emprendimiento en Colombia se ha asociado como una actividad de riesgo, debido al perfil precavido de los habitantes en el país y el alto porcentaje de cierre de nuevos negocios. Esta situación ha generado que se prioricen otro tipo de inversiones, lo que desfavorece a su vez el sistema de creación de empresas. En este contexto, las instituciones de educación tienen la responsabilidad de ofrecer una formación que fomente el emprendimiento, por medio de programas que comprendan la realidad cultural y los deseos de los diferentes grupos de interés. Así, desde un enfoque cuantitativo y de diseno descriptivo, la metodología de la investigación abordó un estudio de caso centrado en la Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior (CUN). El objetivo fue caracterizar las actitudes emprendedoras de los estudiantes de esta Institución de Educación Superior para el periodo de agosto de 2021 a mayo de 2022, con el fin de aumentar el conocimiento y la inclinación de los alumnos frente al emprendimiento. Se encuentra que hay una aceptable predisposición hacia la creación de empresa por parte de los estudiantes, especialmente por el énfasis en el logro. Sin embargo, para su estímulo es recomendable trabajar en su baja flexibilidad y creatividad. ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Entrepreneurship in Colombia has been associated as a risky activity, due to the cautious profile of the country's inhabitants and the high percentage of new business closures. This situation has led to prioritizing other types of investments, which in turn disadvantages the business creation system. In this context, educational institutions have the responsibility of offering training that promotes entrepreneurship, through programs that understand the cultural reality and the wishes of the different interest groups. Thus, from a quantitative and descriptive design approach, the research methodology addressed a case study focused on the Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior (CUN). The objective was to characterize the entrepreneurial attitudes of the students of this Higher Education Institution for the period from August 2021 to May 2022, in order to increase the knowledge and inclination of the students towards entrepreneurship. It is found that there is an acceptable predisposition towards the creation of a company by the students, especially due to the emphasis on achievement. However, for your encouragement it is advisable to work on your low flexibility and creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Miranda, Oscar Mauricio Gómez, 2023. "Actitudes emprendedoras de estudiantes universitarios: caso de una institución de educación superior en Colombia," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 24(1), pages 174-197, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:020631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/7916
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grace Li Ann Yong & Kong Weng Ho, 2006. "Innovation, Imitation And Entrepreneurship," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 51(02), pages 147-173.
    2. Laurin Buchheim & Alexander Krieger & Sarah Arndt, 2020. "Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 509-533, November.
    3. Robert Hébert & Albert Link, 2006. "The Entrepreneur as Innovator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 589-597, September.
    4. Mireille Matt & Véronique Schaeffer, 2018. "Building Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Conducive to Student Entrepreneurship: New Challenges for Universities," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 9-32.
    5. Christian Sandström & Karl Wennberg & Martin W. Wallin & Yulia Zherlygina, 2018. "Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: a review and critical discussion," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1232-1256, October.
    6. Dahesh, Mehran Badin & Tabarsa, Gholamali & Zandieh, Mostafa & Hamidizadeh, Mohammadreza, 2020. "Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Miguel Ángel Rivera Ríos & José Benjamín Lujano López & Josué García Veiga & Oscar Daniel Araujo Loredo, 2022. "Crisis epidemiológica y recesión global: Fractura de la financiarización y el gran nivelador," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 56(1), pages 41-66, Enero-Jun.
    8. Castaño, María Soledad & Méndez, María Teresa & Galindo, Miguel Ángel, 2016. "The effect of public policies on entrepreneurial activity and economic growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5280-5285.
    9. Robert Rybnicek & Sabine Bergner & Alfred Gutschelhofer, 2019. "How individual needs influence motivation effects: a neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 443-482, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnus Henrekson & Anders Kärnä & Tino Sanandaji, 2022. "Schumpeterian entrepreneurship: coveted by policymakers but impervious to top-down policymaking," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 867-890, July.
    2. Mahto, Raj V. & Belousova, Olga & Ahluwalia, Saurabh, 2020. "Abundance – A new window on how disruptive innovation occurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Sophia Belghiti-Mahut & Anne-Laurence Lafont & Angélique Rodhain & Florence Rodhain & Leila Temri & Ouidad Yousfi, 2016. "Genre et innovateur frugal : 4 cas de femmes innovatrices," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 69-93.
    4. Karina Cagarman & Jan Kratzer & Katharina Osbelt, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship: Dissection of a Phenomenon through a German Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Dionisio, Eduardo Avancci & Inácio Júnior, Edmundo & Fischer, Bruno Brandão, 2021. "Country-level efficiency and the index of dynamic entrepreneurship: Contributions from an efficiency approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Stuart D. Allen & Albert N. Link & Dan T. Rosenbaum, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and Human Capital: Evidence of Patenting Activity from the Academic Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(6), pages 937-951, November.
    7. Kuckertz, Andreas & Scheu, Maximilian & Davidsson, Per, 2023. "Chasing mythical creatures – A (not-so-sympathetic) critique of entrepreneurship's obsession with unicorn startups," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    8. Martin P. Allmendinger & Elisabeth S. C. Berger, 2019. "Selecting Corporate Firms For Collaborative Innovation: Entrepreneurial Decision Making In Asymmetric Partnerships," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-34, January.
    9. Magnus Henrekson & Tino Sanandaji, 2020. "Measuring Entrepreneurship: Do Established Metrics Capture Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 733-760, July.
    10. Jörn H. Block & Christian Fisch & Walter Diegel, 2024. "Schumpeterian entrepreneurial digital identity and funding from venture capital firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 119-157, February.
    11. Philip T. Roundy, 2021. "On Entrepreneurial Stories: Tolkien’s Theory of Fantasy and the Bridge between Imagination and Innovation," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 31-45, January.
    12. Henrekson, Magnus & Lakomaa, Erik & Sanandaji, Tino, 2021. "The Interaction of Schumpeterian Institutional Entrepreneurship and Hayekian Institutional Change in Innovative Industries," Working Paper Series 1409, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    13. Sundriyal, Vivek Kumar & Gabrielsson, Jonas, 2024. "The employment consequences of founding an incorporated business among STEM founders: Evidence from Swedish microdata," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Canestrino, Rossella & Ćwiklicki, Marek & Magliocca, Pierpaolo & Pawełek, Barbara, 2020. "Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 132-143.
    15. Ali, Abdul & Kelley, Donna J. & Levie, Jonathan, 2020. "Market-driven entrepreneurship and institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 117-128.
    16. Fini, Riccardo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Meoli, Azzurra, 2020. "The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    17. Rampersad, Giselle, 2020. "Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 68-74.
    18. David B. Audretsch & Donald F. Kuratko & Albert N. Link, 2016. "Dynamic entrepreneurship and technology-based innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 603-620, July.
    19. Sangyun Han & Soo Kyung Park & Kyu Tae Kwak, 2021. "Workforce Composition of Public R&D and Performance: Evidence from Korean Government-Funded Research Institutes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Ivana Blažková & Ondřej Dvouletý, 2022. "Zombies: Who are they and how do firms become zombies?," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 119-145, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    emprendimiento; estudiante; instituto de enseñanza superior; actitud del estudiante; motivación;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:020631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.