IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000441/011528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

El crecimiento de China e India y su relación con el patrón de especialización comercial de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Eliana Rubiano-Matulevich

Abstract

Resumen El reciente desempeno económico de China e India es uno de los fenómenos más estudiados en la actualidad por sus efectos en la economía mundial. Este artículo examina la relación entre estos países y el patrón de especialización comercial de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia durante el periodo 1990-2006. Para tal efecto, se construye un Indice de Ventaja Comparativa revelada (IVCR) con datos a nivel sectorial según el Código Industrial Internacional Uniforme (CIIU) a 3 dígitos, por país y ano. Primero, se estudia la evolución de los índices y los flujos comerciales de cada país a través del tiempo empleando herramientas como correlaciones bivariadas entre los IVCR de cada país, índices de concentración de Herfindahl y estructura de las exportaciones e importaciones a nivel industrial. Segundo, se estima un modelo basado en los IVCR calculados y las exportaciones netas bilaterales para estimar de una manera más sistemática la relación entre China e India y el patrón de especialización comercial de las demás economías. Tercero, dado que toda la teoría de ventajas comparativas está basada en la dotación relativa de factores de producción de cada país, se estima una función translog de valor agregado industrial en función de la dotación de factores productivos para calcular las elasticidades de Rybczynski para cada economía, incorporándose los resultados de este ejercicio en una nueva estimación del modelo inicial. Dado que el volumen de comercio entre Colombia y China e India es aún reducido, también se realiza un análisis indirecto de la relación objeto de estudio teniendo como marco de referencia: los cambios en el patrón de especialización comercial de Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea, las otras dos economías en el análisis y los principales socios comerciales de Colombia dentro de la aprobación e implementación de los Tratados de Libre Comercio (TLC). Finalmente, y a partir de los resultados del análisis directo e indirecto, se presentan algunas recomendaciones de política para Colombia.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliana Rubiano-Matulevich, 2010. "El crecimiento de China e India y su relación con el patrón de especialización comercial de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia," Revista de la Maestría de Derecho Económico, Universidad Javeriana - Derecho Económico, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000441:011528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.javeriana.edu.co/Facultades/C_Juridicas/pub_rev/revista6_2/3.eliana_rubiano_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Imbs & Romain Wacziarg, 2003. "Stages of Diversification," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 63-86, March.
    2. Castro, Lucio & Olarreaga, Marcelo & Saslavsky, Daniel, 2006. "The impact of trade with China and India on Argentina’s manufacturing employment," MPRA Paper 538, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Barry Eichengreen & Hui Tong, 2007. "Is China’s FDI Coming at the Expense of Other Countries?," Chapters, in: Klaus Liebscher & Josef Christl & Peter Mooslechner & Doris Ritzberger-Grünwald (ed.), Foreign Direct Investment in Europe, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Daniel Lederman & Marcelo Olarreaga & Eliana Rubiano, 2008. "Trade Specialization in Latin America: The Impact of China and India," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 144(2), pages 248-271, July.
    5. Philip R. Lane & Sergio L. Schmukler, 2006. "The international financial integration of China and India," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Jun.
    6. Redding, Stephen, 2002. "Specialization dynamics," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 299-334, December.
    7. Lederman, Daniel & Olarreaga, Marcelo & Soloaga, Isidro, 2007. "The growth of China and India in world trade : opportunity or threat for Latin America and the Caribbean?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4320, The World Bank.
    8. Thomas Vollrath, 1991. "A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 127(2), pages 265-280, June.
    9. World Bank, 2007. "World Development Indicators 2007," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 8150.
    10. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2007. "The Impact of China's Import Demand Growth on Sectoral Specialization in Brazil: A CGE Assessment," MPRA Paper 6200, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Amador & Sónia Cabral & José Maria, 2010. "What can we learn from the distribution of trade patterns?," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 9(2), pages 77-95, August.
    2. Daniel Lederman & Marcelo Olarreaga & Guillermo Perry, 2007. "Latin America´s response to China and India: overview of research findings and policy implications - Observatorio de Política," Revista de Economía y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, vol. 45(1), pages 149-193, Junio.
    3. Dalila Nicet-Chenaf & Eric Rougier, 2009. "Human capital and structural change: how do they interact with each others in growth," Post-Print hal-00798441, HAL.
    4. Dominika Choros-Mrozowska, 2020. "Changes and Comparisons in Pattern of Polish Chinese Trade within the “16+1” Format," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 327-342.
    5. Fidrmuc, Jarko & Korhonen, Iikka, 2010. "The impact of the global financial crisis on business cycles in Asian emerging economies," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 293-303, June.
    6. Yin‐Wong Cheung & XingWang Qian, 2010. "Capital Flight: China's Experience," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 227-247, May.
    7. Luca De Benedictis & Marco Gallegati & Massimo Tamberi, 2006. "Overall Specialization and Income: Countries Diversity," Working Papers 37-2006, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised Oct 2008.
    8. Daniel Lederman & Marcelo Olarreaga & Eliana Rubiano, 2008. "Trade Specialization in Latin America: The Impact of China and India," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 144(2), pages 248-271, July.
    9. Aleksandra Parteka, 2010. "Employment and export specialisation along the development path: some robust evidence," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 615-640, January.
    10. Feltenstein, Andrew & Rochon, Céline & Shamloo, Maral, 2010. "High growth and low consumption in East Asia: How to improve welfare while avoiding financial failures," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 25-36, January.
    11. Tri WIDODO, 2009. "Comparative Advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures And Case Studies," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 4, pages 57-82, November.
    12. Lee, Jim, 2011. "Export specialization and economic growth around the world," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 45-63, March.
    13. Ferrari, Tatiana & Biage, Milton & Da Silva, Sergio, 2011. "Impacts of China’s growth on the Brazilian trade," MPRA Paper 29283, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Catia Batista & Jacques Potin, 2007. "Stages of diversification and specialization in an Heckscher-Ohlin world, 1976-2000," Economics Series Working Papers 356, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    15. Ervani, Eva & Widodo, Tri & M. Purnawan, Edhie, 2018. "East Asia’s Pattern of Export Specialization: Does Indonesia Compete with Japan, China, Hong Kong, Korea and Singapore?," MPRA Paper 85259, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Iacovone, Leonardo & Rauch, Ferdinand & Winters, L. Alan, 2013. "Trade as an engine of creative destruction: Mexican experience with Chinese competition," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 379-392.
    17. Wim Naudé & Riaan Rossouw, 2011. "Export diversification and economic performance: evidence from Brazil, China, India and South Africa," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 99-134, April.
    18. Girik Allo, Albertus & Sukartini, Ni Made & Widodo, Tri, 2017. "Dynamic Changes in Comparative Advantage of Indonesian Agricultural Products," MPRA Paper 80028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Sukati, Mphumuzi, 2016. "COMESA’s Revealed Comparative Advantage in Common Agricultural Commodities," MPRA Paper 69989, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Irina Marilena Ban, 2017. "Measuring trade specialization dynamics: the case of Romania and Bulgaria," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 229-248, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    comercio exterior; ventaja comparativa revelada; especialización comercial; factores de producción;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000441:011528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roberto Borda Ridao (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.