IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000195/016167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De la empresa al mercado, factores que inciden en la organización de las cadenas de producción de bioenergía

Author

Listed:
  • María Eugenia Castelao Caruana

Abstract

Aunque existen importantes oportunidades para el desarrollo de la industria de la bioenergía en América Latina, la industria de la bioenergía en materia de generación eléctrica está sumamente rezagada. La literatura internacional coincide en destacar la importancia de las barreras económicas, sociales e institucionales en la penetración deesta industria en el mercado de la energía eléctrica. Para abordar estos factores, los proyectos de bioenergía a nivel individual desarrollan diversas formas de coordinación de los recursos a lo largo de la cadena de producción. Este trabajo presenta los resultados de una investigación exploratoria sobre las barreras que condicionan la implementación de proyectos de bioenergía para la generación de electricidad y las formas de coordinación de las transacciones que adoptan estos proyectos. El análisis se basa en la economía de los costos de transacción y en el estudio de cinco proyectos de generación de bioenergía para la red eléctrica desarrollados en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Suggested Citation

  • María Eugenia Castelao Caruana, 2016. "De la empresa al mercado, factores que inciden en la organización de las cadenas de producción de bioenergía," Revista CIFE, Universidad Santo Tomás, pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000195:016167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/cife/article/view/3451/3470
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry, Guy & Pahun, Jeanne & Trigo, Eduardo, 2014. "La Bioeconomía en América Latina: oportunidades de desarrollo e implicaciones de política e investigación," FACES. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación, vol. 20(42-43), pages 125-141.
    2. Mangoyana, Robert B. & Smith, Timothy F., 2011. "Decentralised bioenergy systems: A review of opportunities and threats," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1286-1295, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahzouni, Arian, 2019. "The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 297-308.
    2. Escalante, K.N. & Belmonte, S. & Gea, M.D., 2013. "Determining factors in process of socio-technical adequacy of renewable energy in Andean Communities of Salta, Argentina," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 275-288.
    3. Roesler, Tim & Hassler, Markus, 2019. "Creating niches – The role of policy for the implementation of bioenergy village cooperatives in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 95-101.
    4. Chong, Yih Tng & Teo, Kwong Meng & Tang, Loon Ching, 2016. "A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 797-809.
    5. He, Guizhen & Bluemling, Bettina & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Zhang, Lei & Lu, Yonglong, 2013. "Comparing centralized and decentralized bio-energy systems in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 34-43.
    6. Brummer, Vasco, 2018. "Community energy – benefits and barriers: A comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 187-196.
    7. You, Siming & Tong, Huanhuan & Armin-Hoiland, Joel & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2017. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas savings assessment of decentralized biomass gasification for electrifying the rural areas of Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 495-510.
    8. Lisa Biber‐Freudenberger & Candan Ergeneman & Jan Janosch Förster & Thomas Dietz & Jan Börner, 2020. "Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio‐based transformation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1220-1235, September.
    9. Eftychia Ntostoglou & Dilip Khatiwada & Viktoria Martin, 2021. "The Potential Contribution of Decentralized Anaerobic Digestion towards Urban Biowaste Recovery Systems: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Cavicchi, Bianca & Bryden, John M. & Vittuari, Matteo, 2014. "A comparison of bioenergy policies and institutional frameworks in the rural areas of Emilia Romagna and Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 355-363.
    11. Kaoma, Mwansa & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2021. "Evaluation of the enabling environment for the sustainable development of rural-based bioenergy systems in Zambia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Mendel Giezen, 2018. "Shifting Infrastructure Landscapes in a Circular Economy: An Institutional Work Analysis of the Water and Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Chen, Qiu & Liu, Tianbiao, 2017. "Biogas system in rural China: Upgrading from decentralized to centralized?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 933-944.
    14. Kabulo Loji & Sachin Sharma & Nomhle Loji & Gulshan Sharma & Pitshou N. Bokoro, 2023. "Operational Issues of Contemporary Distribution Systems: A Review on Recent and Emerging Concerns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Jianliang Wang & Yuru Yang & Yongmei Bentley & Xu Geng & Xiaojie Liu, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Bioenergy from a Global Perspective: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Gohar Nuhoff-Isakhanyan & Emiel F.M. Wubben & S.W.F. Omta, 2016. "Sustainability Benefits and Challenges of Inter-Organizational Collaboration in Bio-Based Business: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Schut, Marc & van Paassen, Annemarie & Leeuwis, Cees & Bos, Sandra & Leonardo, Wilson & Lerner, Anna, 2011. "Space for innovation for sustainable community-based biofuel production and use: Lessons learned for policy from Nhambita community, Mozambique," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5116-5128, September.
    18. Kung, Chih-Chun & Zhang, Ning & Choi, Yongrok & Xiong, Kai & Yu, Jiangli, 2019. "Effectiveness of crop residuals in ethanol and pyrolysis-based electricity production: A stochastic analysis under uncertain climate impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 267-276.
    19. Mangoyana, Robert B. & Smith, Timothy F. & Simpson, Rodney, 2013. "A systems approach to evaluating sustainability of biofuel systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 371-380.
    20. Laurent Gazull & Denis Gautier, 2015. "Woodfuel in a global change context," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 156-170, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fuentes alternativas de energía; comportamiento organizacional; costos de transacción.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000195:016167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jorge Enrique Martínez Carvajal The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jorge Enrique Martínez Carvajal to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/festaco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.