IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000180/011675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gerenciando intangibles en empresas de software aplicando el proceso de análisis por jerarquías y el cuadro de mando integral

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia González González
  • Tatiana Bermúdez Rodríguez

Abstract

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar una metodología que a partir de la integración de dos herramientas como son el Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) y el Balanced Scorecard (BSC), permita gerenciar los intangibles en empresas basadas en el conocimiento como es el caso de las empresas de software. Se efectuó un estudio de caso, cuyos resultados permitieron identificar los intangibles que son prioritarios para este tipo de empresas. Por otro lado, se observó coherencia entre los intangibles prioritarios y la especificidad que cada una de las empresas presenta en cuanto a su razón de ser: diseno, mantenimiento y comercialización. Se concluye que la integración del AHP y el BSC da origen a una metodología que facilita la gestión de los intangibles, a partir de la jerarquización y monitoreo de desempeno y logro de los mismos expresados en objetivos estratégicos e indicadores en empresas de software.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia González González & Tatiana Bermúdez Rodríguez, 2011. "Gerenciando intangibles en empresas de software aplicando el proceso de análisis por jerarquías y el cuadro de mando integral," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000180:011675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/909/90922735006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baruch Lev, 2003. "Remarks on the measurement, valuation, and reporting of intangible assets," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Sep, pages 17-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastien Bradley & Estelle Dauchy & Makoto Hasegawa, 2018. "Investor valuations of Japan’s adoption of a territorial tax regime: quantifying the direct and competitive effects of international tax reform," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 581-630, June.
    2. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    3. Efstathios G. Parcharidis & Nikos C. Varsakelis, 2010. "R&D and Tobin's q in an emerging financial market: the case of the Athens Stock Exchange," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 353-361.
    4. Wolfgang Drobetz & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Anna Merika & Andreas Merikas, 2017. "Determinants of Management Earnings Forecasts: The Case of Global Shipping IPOs," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(5), pages 975-1015, October.
    5. Simon Price, 2004. "UK investment and the return to equity: Q redux," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2004 87, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
    6. Simon Price & Christoph Schleicher, 2006. "Returns to equity, investment and Q: evidence from the United Kingdom," Bank of England working papers 310, Bank of England.
    7. Charles R. Hulten & Xiaohui Hao, 2008. "What is a Company Really Worth? Intangible Capital and the "Market to Book Value" Puzzle," NBER Working Papers 14548, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Yasean A. Tahat & Ahmed H. Ahmed & Mohammad M. Alhadab, 2018. "The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1147-1168, May.
    9. Shigeki Sakakibara & Bo Hansson & Tadanori Yosano & Hideo Kozumi, 2010. "Analysts’ Perceptions of Intellectual Capital Information," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(3), pages 274-285, September.
    10. Zéghal, Daniel & Maaloul, Anis, 2011. "The accounting treatment of intangibles – A critical review of the literature," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 262-274.
    11. João Marcelo Alves, 2008. "Determining Knowledge-Intensive Companies Acquisition Value For M&A Purposes: An Intellectual Capital Approach," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(3), pages 385-402.
    12. Luc Paugam & Jean-François Casta, 2010. "Mesurer le capital organisationnel comme combinaison de ressources," Post-Print halshs-00494560, HAL.
    13. Kristof Van Criekingen & Carter Bloch & Carita Eklund, 2022. "Measuring intangible assets—A review of the state of the art," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1539-1558, December.
    14. Demetrios Eliades & Olaf Weeken, 2005. "The stock market and capital accumulation: an application to UK data," Bank of England working papers 251, Bank of England.
    15. Guillaume Garnotel & Patrick Loux, 2011. "Définition des bonus des dirigeants et performance des entreprises de haute technologie," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(3), pages 119-150, September.
    16. Feijóo, Claudio & Gómez-Barroso, José Luis & Voigt, Peter, 2014. "Exploring the economic value of personal information from firms’ financial statements," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 248-256.
    17. R. G. Walker, 2009. "Discussion of Lev, Radhakrishnan and Zhang," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(3), pages 299-311, September.
    18. Daria Ciriaci, 2011. "Intangible resources: the relevance of training for European firms innovative performance," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2011-06, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Simon Price & Christoph Schleicher, 2005. "Returns To Equity, Investment And Q: Evidence From The Uk," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 73(s1), pages 32-57, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gestión; Intangibles; Proceso de análisis por jerarquías; Cuadro de mando integral; Empresas de Software;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000180:011675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrador (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femngco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.