IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000151/014852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distribucion hiperbolica generalizada: una aplicacion en la seleccion de portafolios y en cuantificacion de medidas de riesgo de mercado

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Luis Alayon G.

Abstract

La distribución hiperbólica generalizada ha sido usada por académicos y profesionales para eliminar los problemas de colas de distribución delgadas en finanzas, y por su utilidad en la modelación de los retornos de los activos y de las medidas de riesgo de mercado. En este trabajo, la distribución hiperbólica generalizada es usada para encontrar el portafolio óptimo y su riesgo de mercado. Igualmente, se desarrolla un método para la Selección de Portafolio Robusto la cual reduce la sensibilidad del portafolio ante variaciones de los parámetros de la distribución. Luego de esto, se muestra un esquema comparativo para determinar cómo la inclusión del nuevo método representa un avance respecto a la teoría de selección de portafolios de Markowitz. Por último, en algunos gráficos se muestra el efecto de los parámetros sobre la forma de la distribución, lo que se usa para generar escenarios de estrés y portafolios óptimos.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Luis Alayon G., 2015. "Distribucion hiperbolica generalizada: una aplicacion en la seleccion de portafolios y en cuantificacion de medidas de riesgo de mercado," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 18(2), pages 249-308, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000151:014852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/economia/article/download/4946/3423
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Hellmich & Stefan Kassberger, 2011. "Efficient and robust portfolio optimization in the multivariate Generalized Hyperbolic framework," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(10), pages 1503-1516.
    2. R.H. Tütüncü & M. Koenig, 2004. "Robust Asset Allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 157-187, November.
    3. David Scott & Diethelm Würtz & Christine Dong & Thanh Tran, 2011. "Moments of the generalized hyperbolic distribution," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 459-476, September.
    4. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    5. Stefan Kassberger & Rüdiger Kiesel, 2006. "A fully parametric approach to return modelling and risk management of hedge funds," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 20(4), pages 472-491, December.
    6. Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen, 1997. "Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 41-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Scutellà & Raffaella Recchia, 2013. "Robust portfolio asset allocation and risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 145-169, April.
    2. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2022. "Robust portfolio selection problems: a comprehensive review," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3203-3264, September.
    3. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2021. "Robust Portfolio Selection Problems: A Comprehensive Review," Papers 2103.13806, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    4. Kim, Joseph H.T. & Kim, So-Yeun, 2019. "Tail risk measures and risk allocation for the class of multivariate normal mean–variance mixture distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 145-157.
    5. Martin Eling, 2006. "Performance measurement of hedge funds using data envelopment analysis," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 20(4), pages 442-471, December.
    6. Juan F. Monge & Mercedes Landete & Jos'e L. Ruiz, 2016. "Sharpe portfolio using a cross-efficiency evaluation," Papers 1610.00937, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    7. Eling, Martin, 2014. "Fitting asset returns to skewed distributions: Are the skew-normal and skew-student good models?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 45-56.
    8. Arismendi, Juan C. & Broda, Simon, 2017. "Multivariate elliptical truncated moments," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 29-44.
    9. Bazovkin, Pavel, 2014. "Geometrical framework for robust portfolio optimization," Discussion Papers in Econometrics and Statistics 01/14, University of Cologne, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics.
    10. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    11. Lakshina, Valeriya, 2020. "Do portfolio investors need to consider the asymmetry of returns on the Russian stock market?," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    12. Lotfi, Somayyeh & Zeniosn, Stravros A., 2016. "Equivalence of Robust VaR and CVaR Optimization," Working Papers 16-03, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    13. Sehgal, Ruchika & Sharma, Amita & Mansini, Renata, 2023. "Worst-case analysis of Omega-VaR ratio optimization model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Harris, Richard D.F. & Stoja, Evarist & Tan, Linzhi, 2017. "The dynamic Black–Litterman approach to asset allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1085-1096.
    15. Zhilin Kang & Zhongfei Li, 2018. "An exact solution to a robust portfolio choice problem with multiple risk measures under ambiguous distribution," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(2), pages 169-195, April.
    16. Gianfranco Guastaroba & Gautam Mitra & M Grazia Speranza, 2011. "Investigating the effectiveness of robust portfolio optimization techniques," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 260-280, September.
    17. Hasanjan Sayit, 2022. "A discussion of stochastic dominance and mean-risk optimal portfolio problems based on mean-variance-mixture models," Papers 2202.02488, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    18. Jiang, Yifu & Olmo, Jose & Atwi, Majed, 2024. "Dynamic robust portfolio selection under market distress," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    19. Frank Fabozzi & Dashan Huang & Guofu Zhou, 2010. "Robust portfolios: contributions from operations research and finance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 191-220, April.
    20. Somayyeh Lotfi & Stavros A. Zenios, 2024. "Robust mean-to-CVaR optimization under ambiguity in distributions means and covariance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 2115-2140, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    distribución hiperbólica generalizada; selección de portafolio; selección deportafolio robusto; valor en riesgo condicional; Markowitz; valor en riesgo condicional delpeor escenario; asignación de activos; administración de riesgos; multiciclo; expectativa; ymomento de estimación condicional.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000151:014852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Facultad de Economía (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferosco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.