IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i4p229-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rise Overrun: Condoization, Gentrification, and the Changing Political Economy of Renting in Toronto

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Grisdale

    (Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Canada)

  • Alan Walks

    (Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Canada)

Abstract

Privately owned high-rise condominiums have been increasing as a proportion of all housing units built in the Greater Toronto Area for many decades. This has inspired a growing literature theorizing both “condoism” as an emergent planning-development regime and the implications of “condoization” and “condofication” for urban governance and everyday life in cities like Toronto. Building on this literature, this article assesses the implications of Toronto’s increasing reliance on (mainly vertical) condominium development for the socio-spatial transformation of the housing market, particularly for renters. Analyzing time-series data from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and the Census of Canada to quantify the effects of the city’s condoization, we answer three key questions: How important is condominium development for understanding the restructuring of Toronto’s economy? How has condoization contributed to the ongoing gentrification of Toronto’s inner city? How is condoization restructuring Toronto’s rental market? Building on previous research categorizing and mapping the gentrification of Toronto’s inner city, we find that condoization is an increasingly defining element restructuring the city’s rental market, while this restructuring also plays a central role in the advancing gentrification of the city’s core.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Grisdale & Alan Walks, 2022. "Rise Overrun: Condoization, Gentrification, and the Changing Political Economy of Renting in Toronto," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 229-244.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:4:p:229-244
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i4.5742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5742
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v7i4.5742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:4:p:229-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.