IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i3p206-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality: Experiences From Havana, Freetown, and Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Butcher

    (Melbourne Centre for Cities, University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Camila Cociña

    (The Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London, UK)

  • Alexandre Apsan Frediani

    (International Institute for Environment and Development, UK)

  • Michele Acuto

    (Melbourne Centre for Cities, University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Brenda Pérez‐Castro

    (Secretariat, Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, Thailand)

  • Jorge Peña‐Díaz

    (Faculty of Architecture, Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), Cuba)

  • Joiselen Cazanave‐Macías

    (Faculty of Architecture, Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), Cuba)

  • Braima Koroma

    (Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, Sierra Leone / Institute of Geography and Development Studies, Njala University, Sierra Leone)

  • Joseph Macarthy

    (Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, Sierra Leone / Institute of Geography and Development Studies, Njala University, Sierra Leone)

Abstract

Feminist, Southern, and decolonial thinkers have long argued that epistemological questions about how knowledge is produced and whose knowledge is valued and actioned are crucial in addressing inequalities, and a key challenge for planning. This collaborative article interrogates how knowledge is mobilised in urban planning and practice, discussing three experiences which have actively centred often-excluded voices, as a way of disrupting knowledge hierarchies in planning. We term these “emancipatory circuits of knowledge”—processes whereby diverse, situated, and marginalised forms of knowledge are co-produced and mobilised across urban research and planning, to address inequalities. We discuss experiences from the Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), a university in Havana, Cuba, that privileges a fluid and collaborative understanding of universities as social actors; the Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, a research institute in the city of Freetown, which curates collective and inclusive spaces for community action planning, to challenge the legacies of colonial-era planning; and the Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, a regional network across Asia, which facilitates processes of exchange and co-learning which are highly strategic and situated in context, to advance community-led development. Shared across these “emancipatory circuits” are three “sites of impact” through which these partners have generated changes: encouraging inclusive policy and planning outcomes; shifting the planning praxis of authorities, bureaucrats, and researchers; and nurturing collective trajectories through building solidarities. Examining these three sites and their challenges, we query how urban knowledge is produced and translated towards epistemic justice, examining the tensions and the possibilities for building pathways to urban equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Butcher & Camila Cociña & Alexandre Apsan Frediani & Michele Acuto & Brenda Pérez‐Castro & Jorge Peña‐Díaz & Joiselen Cazanave‐Macías & Braima Koroma & Joseph Macarthy, 2022. "“Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality: Experiences From Havana, Freetown, and Asia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 206-218.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:3:p:206-218
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i3.5319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5319
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v7i3.5319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:3:p:206-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.