IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i2p162-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Demand-Side Approach for Linking the Past to Future Urban–Rural Development

Author

Listed:
  • Schuman Lam

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China)

  • Heng Li

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China)

  • Ann Yu

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China)

Abstract

Is economy-led urbanization the only answer to urban planning? By 2050, about 70% of the world population will live in urban areas, intensified by rapid urbanization in developing countries. A new urban development framework is critically relevant to investigating urban living’s emerging complexity for advancing human-social-economic-environmental sustainability. The multi-disciplinary study explores a roadmap for solving industrialization’s adverse effects to inform future resilient development in developing countries. The classical Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (MHN) and some scholars have stated that human physiological needs would be prioritized and fulfilled by developing countries, and psychological needs would be satisfied and desired by developed countries after fulfilling physiological needs level. Our study argued that transit-oriented-development (TOD) and ICT could simultaneously fulfill some essential physio-psychological needs with digital-ruralism. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was adopted to test the indicator-based MHN theory developed by literature, urban quality of life (Uqol) evaluation between the developing and developed countries, and backed by digital-ruralism success in developing China. The Uqol evaluation identifies the developing countries’ subjective well-being demand as the health, mobility, governance, environment, social, economy, human capital, technology-ICT, smart living, and lifestyle, which are used to transform the classical MHN model to the indicator-based MHN model. The SEM subsequently illustrates that the observed well-being indicators are positively correlated to the TOD and ICT, defined by the proposed urban-ruralism development framework. The study contributes to an innovative approach to reconnect the classical MHN theory to contemporary sustainable urban planning while narrowing the socioeconomic-environmental gap between the developed (urban) and developing (rural) domains, which encourages a paradigm shift for future resilient urban development in the developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Schuman Lam & Heng Li & Ann Yu, 2021. "A Demand-Side Approach for Linking the Past to Future Urban–Rural Development," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 162-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:2:p:162-174
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v6i2.3798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3798
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v6i2.3798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee, 2016. "Work-Life Balance: A Quality-of-Life Model," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1059-1082, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karina Landman, 2021. "Rapidly Changing Cities: Working with Socio-Ecological Systems to Facilitate Transformation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 139-142.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong-Jin Lee & M. Joseph Sirgy, 2018. "What Do People Do to Achieve Work–Life Balance? A Formative Conceptualization to Help Develop a Metric for Large-Scale Quality-of-Life Surveys," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(2), pages 771-791, July.
    2. Schuman Lam & Heng Li & Ann Yu, 2021. "A Demand-Side Approach for Linking the Past to Future Urban–Rural Development," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 162-174.
    3. Zhang, Shihang & Moeckel, Rolf & Moreno, Ana Tsui & Shuai, Bin & Gao, Jie, 2020. "A work-life conflict perspective on telework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 51-68.
    4. Adrián Segura-Camacho & Juan-José García-Orozco & Gabriela Topa, 2018. "Sustainable and Healthy Organizations Promote Employee Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Winda Widyanty & Dian Primanita Oktasari & Sugeng Santoso & Sik Sumaedi & Medi Yarmen & I Gede Mahatma Yuda Bakti & Mochammad Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Sebastian Saniuk, 2024. "The Model of Worker’s Quality of Life During Covid-19 Pandemic: The Role of Perceived Organizational Support (POS), Digital Literacy, Covid-19-Related Workplace Policy, Quality Culture, and Safety C," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    6. Jun Yu & Yihong Wu, 2021. "The Impact of Enforced Working from Home on Employee Job Satisfaction during COVID-19: An Event System Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Romel C. Mutya & Immar Jun R. Geverola & Alfredo C. Cano Jr. & Renato V. Friolo, 2022. "Coping with uncertainties: Unveiling the lived experiences of working students in the new normal," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 12(1), pages 112-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:2:p:162-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.