IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i1p156-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Planning by Experiment: Practices, Outcomes, and Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Scholl

    (Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands)

  • Joop de Kraker

    (Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands / Department of Environmental Sciences, Open Universiteit, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The impact of urban experimentation on urban planning approaches is so far insufficiently assessed and discussed. This thematic issue sets out to investigate the possibilities and limitations of ‘urban planning by experiment,’ defined as an approach that uses experimentation to innovate and improve urban planning instruments, approaches, and outcomes. It brings together eight contributions presenting original research on urban experimentation and its relation to urban planning. All contributions are empirically grounded in (illustrative) case studies, mostly from European cities. Here, we summarize and discuss the major findings across the eight contributions with respect to three key themes: the practices of urban experimentation, its outcomes, and its impacts on urban planning. We conclude that the practices of urban experimentation described in the contributions generated a wide variety of substantive and learning outcomes, which, according to the authors, represent worthwhile additions or alternatives to the current repertoire of approaches and instruments of urban planning. However, except for a single case, large-scale integration of experimentation in established approaches to urban planning was not observed, let alone a complete transformation of urban planning practices. An area for further research concerns the relation between the way urban experiments are organized and conducted, and their impact on urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment: Practices, Outcomes, and Impacts," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 156-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:1:p:156-160
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v6i1.4248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4248
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v6i1.4248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Wanner & Boris Bachmann & Timo von Wirth, 2021. "Contextualising Urban Experimentation: Analysing the Utopiastadt Campus Case with the Theory of Strategic Action Fields," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 235-248.
    2. Matthias Wanner & Boris Bachmann & Timo von Wirth, 2021. "Contextualising Urban Experimentation: Analysing the Utopiastadt Campus Case with the Theory of Strategic Action Fields," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 235-248.
    3. Christian Scholl & René Kemp, 2016. "City Labs as Vehicles for Innovation in Urban Planning Processes," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 89-102.
    4. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    5. James Evans & Tomáš Vácha & Henk Kok & Kelly Watson, 2021. "How Cities Learn: From Experimentation to Transformation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 171-182.
    6. Peter Pelzer & Roger Hildingsson & Alice Herrström & Johannes Stripple, 2021. "Planning for 1000 Years: The Råängen Experiment," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 249-262.
    7. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    8. Lina Berglund-Snodgrass & Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, 2020. "Conceptualizing Testbed Planning: Urban Planning in the Intersection between Experimental and Public Sector Logics," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 96-106.
    9. Peter Pelzer & Roger Hildingsson & Alice Herrström & Johannes Stripple, 2021. "Planning for 1000 Years: The Råängen Experiment," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 249-262.
    10. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    11. Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "The Practice of Urban Experimentation in Dutch City Labs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 161-170.
    12. James Evans & Tomáš Vácha & Henk Kok & Kelly Watson, 2021. "How Cities Learn: From Experimentation to Transformation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 171-182.
    13. Christian Scholl & René Kemp, 2016. "City Labs as Vehicles for Innovation in Urban Planning Processes," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 89-102.
    14. Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "The Practice of Urban Experimentation in Dutch City Labs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 161-170.
    15. Erica Eneqvist & Andrew Karvonen, 2021. "Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 183-194.
    16. Erica Eneqvist & Andrew Karvonen, 2021. "Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 183-194.
    17. Lina Berglund-Snodgrass & Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, 2020. "Conceptualizing Testbed Planning: Urban Planning in the Intersection between Experimental and Public Sector Logics," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 96-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment: Practices, Outcomes, and Impacts," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 156-160.
    2. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    3. Erica Eneqvist & Andrew Karvonen, 2021. "Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 183-194.
    4. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    5. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    6. Lennert Verhulst & Corneel Casier & Frank Witlox, 2023. "Street Experiments and COVID‐19: Challenges, Responses and Systemic Change," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 114(1), pages 43-57, February.
    7. Luise Kraaz & Maria Kopp & Maximilian Wunsch & Uwe Plank-Wiedenbeck, 2022. "The Scaling Potential of Experimental Knowledge in the Case of the Bauhaus.MobilityLab, Erfurt (Germany)," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 274-284.
    8. Sandra Huning & Christiane Droste & Katrin Gliemann, 2021. "Promoting Interculture in Participation in German Urban Planning: Fields of Action for Institutional Change," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 127-138.
    9. Fredrik Envall, 2023. "Situated dynamics of environmental governance in Swedish smart energy experimentation: Tentativeness, demonstration, upscaling," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 922-940, August.
    10. Matthias Wanner & Boris Bachmann & Timo von Wirth, 2021. "Contextualising Urban Experimentation: Analysing the Utopiastadt Campus Case with the Theory of Strategic Action Fields," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 235-248.
    11. Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "The Practice of Urban Experimentation in Dutch City Labs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 161-170.
    12. Margarita Vološina & Evija Taurene & Pēteris Šķiņķis, 2023. "Towards Liveability in Historic Centres: Challenges and Enablers of Transformation in Two Latvian Towns," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 52-66.
    13. Ulrik Kohl & John Andersen, 2022. "Copenhagen’s Struggle to Become the World’s First Carbon Neutral Capital: How Corporatist Power Beats Sustainability," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 230-241.
    14. Harry den Hartog, 2021. "Shanghai’s Regenerated Industrial Waterfronts: Urban Lab for Sustainability Transitions?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 181-196.
    15. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    16. Sandra Huning & Christiane Droste & Katrin Gliemann, 2021. "Promoting Interculture in Participation in German Urban Planning: Fields of Action for Institutional Change," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 127-138.
    17. Erica Eneqvist & Andrew Karvonen, 2021. "Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 183-194.
    18. Ozge CELIK YILMAZ & Ozhan ERTEKIN, 2023. "Urban Living Labs As A Tool To Achieve Sustainable Development Goal 16: A Case Study Of Istanbul, Turkiye," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(3), pages 88-118, August.
    19. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Candel, Melissa & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Enhancing public value with co-creation in public land development: The role of municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:1:p:156-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.