IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v6y2018i4p207-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Everywhere We Go, People Seem to Know”: Mad Students and Knowledge Construction of Mental Illness in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Lieve Carette

    (Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Elisabeth De Schauwer

    (Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Geert Van Hove

    (Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Belgium)

Abstract

Psychological wellbeing has received attention from academics and policymakers worldwide. Initiatives to improve psychoeducation, campaigns to raise awareness, and charity projects have been established as part of efforts to change public attitudes and behaviors toward mental health problems. The common goal of these initiatives is the prevention of mental health problems in order to reduce the global burden of mental health disease. Some target groups have benefited from such initiatives. However, little attention has been paid to side effects—including harm—of widespread knowledge sharing that is not accompanied by appropriate action. Young adults may be less afraid than older adults to disclose mental health illness and share their lived experiences of mental health. Like older adults, students try to protect their autonomy and privacy in disclosing mental health problems and associated diagnoses. However, many young adults view self-disclosure as a request for help. Confronted with rising demand to support students’ psychological well-being, many higher education providers have launched initiatives to improve students’ knowledge about mental illness. Instead of making assumptions about what students need to know in order to improve their overall psychological wellbeing, we asked ‘Mad students’ (that is, students who identify as mentally ill) about their knowledge construction and management of mental illness. Analyzing this process highlights that mental health promotion is more complicated than sharing appropriate information or applying effective strategies. Knowledge sharing has improved public knowledge of mental illness. However, mental health promotion that omits simple communication about expectations and needs around mental health, to co-produce a shared knowledge base, may lead to misunderstanding and failure in meeting the needs of target groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Lieve Carette & Elisabeth De Schauwer & Geert Van Hove, 2018. "“Everywhere We Go, People Seem to Know”: Mad Students and Knowledge Construction of Mental Illness in Higher Education," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 207-217.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:207-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1683
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. China Mills, 2018. "From ‘Invisible Problem’ to Global Priority: The Inclusion of Mental Health in the Sustainable Development Goals," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 843-866, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Zhang & Suhong Zhou & Lanlan Qi & Yue Deng, 2022. "Nonlinear Effects of the Neighborhood Environments on Residents’ Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Yannick Klein & Petra Lindfors & Walter Osika & Linda L. Magnusson Hanson & Cecilia U. D. Stenfors, 2022. "Residential Greenspace Is Associated with Lower Levels of Depressive and Burnout Symptoms, and Higher Levels of Life Satisfaction: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Carolina Gonzálvez & Mariola Giménez-Miralles & María Vicent & Ricardo Sanmartín & María José Quiles & José Manuel García-Fernández, 2021. "School Refusal Behaviour Profiles and Academic Self-Attributions in Language and Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:207-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.