IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v5y2017i3p148-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Views of the Child Reports: Hearing Directly from Children Involved in Post-Separation Disputes

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Birnbaum

    (King’s University College, Western University, Canada)

Abstract

Views of the Child reports are being increasingly used in Canada and other countries as a means of directly obtaining the child’s perspective on disputes between their parents and/or guardians. The reports provide information about the child’s perspective based on one or more interviews with a social worker. Yet, little research exists about their use and impact, the benefits and limitations of the approach, and less about what factors need to be considered in establishing practices and protocols to safely advance children’s views before the court. This article draws on the direct experiences of 24 children between the ages of 6–17 years about their views and preferences during family breakdown. The children describe how they wanted to speak to someone about their views and preferences, raised questions about the accuracy of the reporting of their views, the need for protecting their confidentiality by having a say of what is included in the report, and their support for children’s participation in decision-making post-separation. Practice, research and policy considerations are also highlighted in order for children’s participation to be truly meaningful to them, their parents and the courts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Birnbaum, 2017. "Views of the Child Reports: Hearing Directly from Children Involved in Post-Separation Disputes," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 148-154.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v5:y:2017:i:3:p:148-154
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i3.922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v5i3.922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v5:y:2017:i:3:p:148-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.