IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v8y2020i3p312-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trans* Politics and the Feminist Project: Revisiting the Politics of Recognition to Resolve Impasses

Author

Listed:
  • Zara Saeidzadeh

    (Department of Gender Studies, Örebro University, Sweden)

  • Sofia Strid

    (Department of Gender Studies, Örebro University, Sweden)

Abstract

The debates on, in, and between feminist and trans* movements have been politically intense at best and aggressively hostile at worst. The key contestations have revolved around three issues: First, the question of who constitutes a woman; second, what constitute feminist interests; and third, how trans* politics intersects with feminist politics. Despite decades of debates and scholarship, these impasses remain unbroken. In this article, our aim is to work out a way through these impasses. We argue that all three types of contestations are deeply invested in notions of identity, and therefore dealt with in an identitarian way. This has not been constructive in resolving the antagonistic relationship between the trans* movement and feminism. We aim to disentangle the antagonism within anti-trans* feminist politics on the one hand, and trans* politics’ responses to that antagonism on the other. In so doing, we argue for a politics of status-based recognition (drawing on Fraser, 2000a, 2000b) instead of identity-based recognition, highlighting individuals’ specific needs in society rather than women’s common interests (drawing on Jónasdóttir, 1991), and conceptualising the intersections of the trans* movement and feminism as mutually shaping rather than as trans* as additive to the feminist project (drawing on Walby, 2007, and Walby, Armstrong, and Strid, 2012). We do this by analysing the main contemporary scholarly debates on the relationship between the trans* movement and feminism within feminist and trans* politics. Unafraid of a polemic approach, our selection of material is strategic and illuminates the specific arguments put forward in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Zara Saeidzadeh & Sofia Strid, 2020. "Trans* Politics and the Feminist Project: Revisiting the Politics of Recognition to Resolve Impasses," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 312-320.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:312-320
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i3.2825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2825
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diamond, Irene & Hartsock, Nancy, 1981. "Beyond Interests in Politics: A Comment on Virginia Sapiro's “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women”," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 717-721, September.
    2. Sapiro, Virginia, 1981. "Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 701-716, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mieke Verloo & Anna van der Vleuten, 2020. "Trans* Politics: Current Challenges and Contestations Regarding Bodies, Recognition, and Trans* Organising," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 223-230.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zara Saeidzadeh & Sofia Strid, 2020. "Trans* Politics and the Feminist Project: Revisiting the Politics of Recognition to Resolve Impasses," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 312-320.
    2. Udi Sommer, 2018. "Women, Demography, and Politics: How Lower Fertility Rates Lead to Democracy," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(2), pages 559-586, April.
    3. Berlina Kesuma Suci & Kyohei Yamada & Kodrat Wibowo, 2020. "Does Female Politician Affect Policy Outcomes in Indonesia?," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 202003, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Jan 2020.
    4. Girard, Alexandra M., 2014. "Stepping into Formal Politics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Dahlum, Sirianne & Knutsen, Carl Henrik & Mechkova, Valeriya, 2022. "Women’s political empowerment and economic growth," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Jung Taek Han & Seo Yeon Kim, 2019. "Debunking myths about oil: A case study of oil subsidies," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(2), pages 186-200, June.
    7. Aris Trantidis, 2017. "The problem of constitutional legitimation: what the debate on electoral quotas tells us about the legitimacy of decision-making rules in constitutional choice," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 195-208, June.
    8. Deniz Guvercin, 2019. "Going to the Polls or Feeding Children? An Empirical Investigation of Voter Turnout among Turkish Women with Children at Home," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16.
    9. Sarah Bulloch, 2013. "Seeking Construct Validity in Interpersonal Trust Research: A Proposal on Linking Theory and Survey Measures," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 1289-1310, September.
    10. Sae Okura, 2021. "Representing Women’s Interests in Japan’s Civil Society," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, August.
    11. Blome, Agnes & Fuchs, Gesine, 2017. "Macht und substantielle Repräsentation von Frauen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 55-69.
    12. Lisa Young, 1997. "Gender Equal Legislatures: Evaluating the Proposed Nunavut Electoral System," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 23(3), pages 306-315, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:312-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.