Author
Listed:
- Anne Isabel Kraus
(Center for Peace Mediation, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Germany)
- Owen Frazer
(Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, Switzerland)
- Lars Kirchhoff
(Center for Peace Mediation, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Germany)
- Tatiana Kyselova
(Mediation and Dialogue Research Center, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine)
- Simon J. A. Mason
(Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, Switzerland)
- Julia Palmiano Federer
(Swisspeace, University of Basel, Switzerland)
Abstract
This article focuses on the dilemmas and trade-offs that third parties face when mediating violent political conflicts. Should they ignore human rights violations because pushing the issue could jeopardize relationships with political actors who grant access for humanitarian aid? Will bringing moderates and hardliners together help the peace process or radicalize moderate actors? What should dialogue facilitators do when the act of identifying non-mainstream groups to be included into dialogue increases division and polarization? The activity of peacemaking is inherently characterized by such process and strategy dilemmas where two equally compulsory imperatives seem not to be attainable at the same time. The article proposes a framework to break out of either-or thinking in these situations. We argue that: 1) making oneself aware of how a decision is perceived, and 2) systematically exploring a set of different strategies for creating new unexpected options helps to ease these decisions and avoid rotten compromises. The model reworks and combines existing problem-solving strategies to create a new explorative option generation approach to peacemaking dilemmas and trade-offs. Some of these strategies, such as sequencing and incrementalization, are already well-established in peacemaking. Others, such as compartmentalization and utilization, are rather unconsciously used. All identified strategies, however, are not yet systematically employed to manage third parties’ own dilemmas and trade-offs. Under the suggested framework, these strategies can act in complement to synthesize creativity and strategic thinking with surprising ease. Using examples from the authors’ peacemaking activities and observations in Myanmar, Thailand, and Ukraine, the article demonstrates the real-world benefits of the framework in terms of decision assessment and optional thinking.
Suggested Citation
Anne Isabel Kraus & Owen Frazer & Lars Kirchhoff & Tatiana Kyselova & Simon J. A. Mason & Julia Palmiano Federer, 2019.
"Dilemmas and Trade-Offs in Peacemaking: A Framework for Navigating Difficult Decisions,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 331-342.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:4:p:331-342
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i4.2234
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:4:p:331-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.