IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v12y2024a7348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Russian War Against Ukraine and Its Implications for the Future of Liberal Interventionism

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Geis

    (Institute of International Politics, Helmut Schmidt University, Germany)

  • Ursula Schröder

    (Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

The Russian war against Ukraine has already had crucial implications for the future of liberal interventionism. Drawing on current debates in IR about the transformation of the global world order, the article outlines how processes of global reordering affect (liberal) interventionism at different scales. The article argues that what has become known as the liberal international order is in retreat, at the expense of liberal peace-oriented international interventions. At the same time, current geopolitical realignments appear to be dividing the world into new spheres of influence, pitting democracies against autocracies at the global level and within regional conflicts. However, when it comes to security interventions and peacekeeping, the emerging realities on the ground, where a growing number of actors with different agendas interact, are more complex than simplistic world-order narratives suggest. Using the cases of international peacekeeping and security assistance as examples, the article shows that in some current international intervention sites, the emerging “multi-order world” is characterised by complicated constellations of parallel external assistance offers and rapid shifts in allegiances that do not necessarily follow clear divisions between “authoritarian” and “liberal” forms of assistance. The article therefore does not confirm expectations of the emergence of a “new Cold War” and a new round of ideological competition between international systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Geis & Ursula Schröder, 2024. "The Russian War Against Ukraine and Its Implications for the Future of Liberal Interventionism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:7348
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.7348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7348
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.7348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornelia Baciu & Falk Ostermann & Wolfgang Wagner, 2024. "The Crisis of Liberal Interventionism and the Return of War," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    2. Richard Higgott & Simon Reich, 2022. "The age of fuzzy bifurcation: Lessons from the pandemic and the Ukraine War," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 627-639, November.
    3. Mateja Peter, 2024. "Global Fragmentation and Collective Security Instruments: Weakening the Liberal International Order From Within," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    4. Lake, David A. & Martin, Lisa L. & Risse, Thomas, 2021. "Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 225-257, February.
    5. Malte Brosig & Friedrich Plank & Yf Reykers, 2023. "Governance Through Regime Complexity: What Role for the EU in the African Security Regime Complex?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 72-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    3. Max‐Otto Baumann & Sebastian Haug & Silke Weinlich, 2024. "From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 51-61, May.
    4. Andrew Lugg, 2024. "Re-contracting intergovernmental organizations: Membership change and the creation of linked intergovernmental organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 545-577, September.
    5. Lukas Linsi & Ellie Gristwood, 2024. "The Myth of Deglobalization: Multinational Corporations in an Era of Growing Geopolitical Rivalries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    6. Mateja Peter, 2024. "Global Fragmentation and Collective Security Instruments: Weakening the Liberal International Order From Within," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    7. Börzel, Tanja A. & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 75(2), pages 282-305.
    8. Luis Aue & Florian Börgel, 2023. "From “Bangtan Boys” to “International Relations Professor”: Mapping Self‐Identifications in the UN’s Twitter Public," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 120-133.
    9. Taiwo Adeagbo, 2024. "Taking Populism Seriously: A Focus on Global Economy and the International Organizations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 49-67, March.
    10. Wil Hout & Michal Onderco, 2022. "Developing Countries and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-5.
    11. Lipps, Jana & Jacob, Marc S, 2022. "Undermining Liberal International Organizations from Within: Evidence from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt6fg0093j, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    12. Nizan Feldman & Carmela Lutmar & Leah Mandler, 2024. "Masks Down: Diplomacy and Regime Stability in the Post‐Covid‐19 Era," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    13. Hulvey, Rachel A, 2022. "Cyber Sovereignty: How China is Changing the Rules of Internet Freedom," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt7sg3716k, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    14. Cornelia Baciu & Falk Ostermann & Wolfgang Wagner, 2024. "The Crisis of Liberal Interventionism and the Return of War," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    15. Anderson, John E., 2024. "Confidence in the world bank and IMF: Alignment of individual beliefs and institutional policies," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Richard Higgott & Taelyn Reid, 2023. "Strongman leadership and the limits to international cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 451-463, June.
    17. Robert Wolfe, 2022. "Is using trade policy for foreign policy a “SNO job”? On linkage, friend-shoring and the challenges for multilateralism," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/74, European University Institute.
    18. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M & Schneider, Christina J, 2023. "The International Liberal Foundations of Democratic Backsliding," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt0965w1jb, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    19. Zürn, Michael, 2022. "Macht Putin den (Neo-)Realismus stark?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 395-412.
    20. Inken Borzyskowski & Felicity Vabulas, 2024. "Public support for withdrawal from international organizations: Experimental evidence from the US," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 809-845, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:7348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.