Author
Listed:
- Aron Buzogány
(Institute of Forest, Environmental, and Natural Resource Policy, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Austria / Institute for Political Science, HUN‐REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary)
- Stefan Ćetković
(Munich School of Politics and Public Policy, Technical University of Munich, Germany / Institute of Political Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands)
- Tomas Maltby
(Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, UK)
Abstract
When faced with highly heterogeneous national conditions and preferences, the EU has often resorted to differentiation to ensure political support for advancing common policies. Despite growing scholarly interest in differentiation in the EU, conceptual clarity and empirical evidence of different forms of differentiation are still in a nascent stage. Particularly the use of differentiation in times of crisis needs to be better understood. To address this research gap, we investigate differentiation in the EU renewable energy policy in response to the crisis stirred by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. We find that the EU successfully used the Ukraine crisis to increase the ambition of renewable energy policy, but this was accompanied by various and often novel forms of differentiation. Rather than formally exempting countries from common EU provisions (differentiated integration), EU decision-makers strategically incorporated flexibility in implementation, often tailored to a few outlier countries. Strategic flexibility was instrumental in overcoming political disagreements among national governments and adopting a more ambitious and comprehensive renewable energy policy. Our findings contribute conceptually and empirically to understanding various forms of differentiation in EU policymaking and how they are employed to facilitate the building of political majorities during crises.
Suggested Citation
Aron Buzogány & Stefan Ćetković & Tomas Maltby, 2023.
"EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 263-274.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:4:p:263-274
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:4:p:263-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.