IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v10y2022i2p208-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergence Across the Atlantic? US Skepticism Meets the EU and the WTO’s Appellate Body

Author

Listed:
  • Bart Kerremans

    (Leuven International and European Studies (LINES), University of Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

In 2019, the Appellate Body (AB) of the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement System (WTO-DSS) lost its quorum. Instead of the required minimum number of three members, the AB’s membership fell to one member only as the US under Donald Trump blocked the appointment of new members upon the expiry of the terms of two incumbent ones. The AB’s paralysis produced a high level of shock in the EU. In this article, we take a closer look at the US’s decision to paralyze the WTO’s AB and the EU’s reaction to it. Its point is that it will not be easy to get the US back on board as the factors that drove its decision predate the Trump era. Long before Trump, the tradeoff upon which the US based its acceptance of the WTO-DSS unraveled. For US policy makers, the EU is partly to blame for this as it undermined the system’s prompt compliance assumption. More important even is the claim that the system’s AB created new obligations for the WTO members to the point where the acceptance of some WTO rules—notably regarding trade remedies—became politically unsustainable in the US itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart Kerremans, 2022. "Divergence Across the Atlantic? US Skepticism Meets the EU and the WTO’s Appellate Body," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 208-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:2:p:208-218
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v10i2.4983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4983
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v10i2.4983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Maggi & Robert W. Staiger, 2018. "Trade Disputes And Settlement," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(1), pages 19-50, February.
    2. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson & Kaveh Majlesi, 2020. "Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(10), pages 3139-3183, October.
    3. Krzysztof Pelc & Johannes Urpelainen, 2015. "When do international economic agreements allow countries to pay to breach?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 231-264, June.
    4. Marianne Riddervold & Akasemi Newsome, 2022. "Introduction: Out With the Old, In With the New? Explaining Changing EU–US Relations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 128-133.
    5. Marianne Riddervold & Akasemi Newsome, 2022. "Introduction: Out With the Old, In With the New? Explaining Changing EU–US Relations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 128-133.
    6. Busch, Marc L. & Pelc, Krzysztof J., 2010. "The Politics of Judicial Economy at the World Trade Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 257-279, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Smith, 2022. "How Much of a New Agenda? International Structures, Agency, and Transatlantic Order," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 219-228.
    2. Herman Mark Schwartz, 2022. "The European Union, the United States, and Trade: Metaphorical Climate Change, Not Bad Weather," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 186-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bart Kerremans, 2022. "Divergence Across the Atlantic? US Skepticism Meets the EU and the WTO’s Appellate Body," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 208-218.
    2. Michael Smith, 2022. "How Much of a New Agenda? International Structures, Agency, and Transatlantic Order," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 219-228.
    3. Herman Mark Schwartz, 2022. "The European Union, the United States, and Trade: Metaphorical Climate Change, Not Bad Weather," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 186-197.
    4. Ingrid Hjertaker & Bent Sofus Tranøy, 2022. "The Dollar as a Mutual Problem: New Transatlantic Interdependence in Finance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 198-207.
    5. Gorm Rye Olsen, 2022. "“America is Back” or “America First” and the Transatlantic Relationship," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 154-164.
    6. Kazutaka Takechi, 2023. "How are the precedents of trade policy rules made under the World Trade Organization?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 806-821, November.
    7. Christina Davis, 2015. "The political logic of dispute settlement: Introduction to the special issue," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 107-117, June.
    8. Kolja Raube & Raquel Vega Rubio, 2022. "Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 176-185.
    9. Mai'a K. Davis Cross, 2022. "Space Security and the Transatlantic Relationship," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 134-143.
    10. Gorm Rye Olsen, 2022. "“America is Back” or “America First” and the Transatlantic Relationship," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 154-164.
    11. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    12. Tommaso Colussi & Ingo E. Isphording & Nico Pestel, 2021. "Minority Salience and Political Extremism," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 237-271, July.
    13. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Komlos, John & Schubert, Hermann, 2019. "Les origines du triomphe de Donald Trump," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 26.
    15. Furtado, Delia & Kong, Haiyang, 2021. "How Do Low-Skilled Immigrants Adjust to Chinese Import Shocks? Evidence Using English Language Proficiency," IZA Discussion Papers 14152, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Aggeborn, Linuz & Persson, Lovisa, 2017. "Public Finance and Right-Wing Populism," Working Paper Series 1182, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    17. Young Jun Chun & Jeong Hwan Lee & Deokwoo Nam, 2025. "Estimating the Income Elasticity of Marginal Utility: A Study Using South Korean Household Survey Data," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 41, pages 87-110.
    18. Biswajit Banerjee & Risto Herrala, 2024. "Testing the impact of liquidation speed on leverage using Indian data," Working Papers 113, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
    19. Francisco Costa & Angelo Marcantonio & Rudi Rocha, 2023. "Stop Suffering! Economic Downturns and Pentecostal Upsurge," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 215-250.
    20. Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Stein, Ernesto H. & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2019. "Trade Attitudes in Latin America: Evidence from a Multi-Country Survey Experiment," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9603, Inter-American Development Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:2:p:208-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.