IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i3p205-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Computational Approach to Analyzing the Twitter Debate on Gaming Disorder

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Schatto-Eckrodt

    (University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany)

  • Robin Janzik

    (University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany)

  • Felix Reer

    (University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany)

  • Svenja Boberg

    (University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany)

  • Thorsten Quandt

    (University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany)

Abstract

The recognition of excessive forms of media entertainment use (such as uncontrolled video gaming or the use of social networking sites) as a disorder is a topic widely discussed among scientists and therapists, but also among politicians, journalists, users, and the industry. In 2018, when the World Health Organization (WHO) decided to include the addictive use of digital games (gaming disorder) as a diagnosis in the International Classification of Diseases, the debate reached a new peak. In the current article, we aim to provide insights into the public debate on gaming disorder by examining data from Twitter for 11 months prior to and 8 months after the WHO decision, analyzing the (change in) topics, actors, and sentiment over time. Automated content analysis revealed that the debate is organic and not driven by spam accounts or other overly active ‘power users.’ The WHO announcement had a major impact on the debate, moving it away from the topics of parenting and child welfare, largely by activating actors from gaming culture. The WHO decision also resulted in a major backlash, increasing negative sentiments within the debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Schatto-Eckrodt & Robin Janzik & Felix Reer & Svenja Boberg & Thorsten Quandt, 2020. "A Computational Approach to Analyzing the Twitter Debate on Gaming Disorder," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 205-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:205-218
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i3.3128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:205-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.