IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i4p94-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Role of Online Uncivil Discussion and Ideological Extremity on Illegal Protest

Author

Listed:
  • Bingbing Zhang

    (Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications, Pennsylvania State University, USA / Democracy Research Unit, University of Salamanca, Spain)

  • Isabel Inguanzo

    (Democracy Research Unit, University of Salamanca, Spain)

  • Homero Gil de Zúñiga

    (Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications, Pennsylvania State University, USA / Democracy Research Unit, University of Salamanca, Spain / Faculty of Communication and Humanities, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increased academic interest revolving around the beneficial or pernicious effects of ideological extremity and (uncivil) political discussion over democracy. For instance, citizens’ ideological predispositions and higher levels of political discussion have been linked with a more active and vibrant political life. In fact, ideological extremity and uncivil discussion foster institutionalized political engagement. However, less explored in the literature remains whether such polarization and uncivil discussions may be related to unlawful political behavior such as illegal protest. This study contends that one of the main drivers of illegal protest behavior lies in online uncivil political discussion, specifically through the normalization and activation of further incivility. We tested this through a two-wave panel data drawn from a diverse US sample and cross-sectional, lagged, and autoregressive regression models. Mediation analysis was also conducted to test whether uncivil online discussion mediated the relationship between frequency of online political discussion and illegal protest engagement. Overall, we found that illegal protest was particularly associated with online uncivil discussion, while ideological extremity and other forms of online and offline discussions seemed to have no effect on unlawful protest over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingbing Zhang & Isabel Inguanzo & Homero Gil de Zúñiga, 2022. "Examining the Role of Online Uncivil Discussion and Ideological Extremity on Illegal Protest," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 94-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:94-104
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v10i4.5694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5694
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:94-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.