IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2013i2piturlea.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romanian organizations to the new challenges of the knowledge society

Author

Listed:
  • Marius PIŢURLEA

    (Faculty of Economical Sciences, VALAHIA University of Târgovişte, România)

  • Alina Georgiana IANCU

    (Faculty of Economical Sciences, VALAHIA University of Târgovişte, România)

  • Dorin IANCU

    (Faculty of Economical Sciences, VALAHIA University of Târgovişte, România)

Abstract

Knowledge seems to be the only power that ensures social progress, economic and democratic that is not eroded over time. Orientation to capture and assimilation of knowledge is the most organizations confirmation of functional maturity consistent with the essence of the traim. Knowledge information has become an important economic factor and began to be subject to management processes. Knowledge is usually defined as the power to understand and capture the essence of the material, use of certitudes and information obtained in the form of experience or education. The knowledge society represents a new economy where innovation process (the ability to absorb and convert new knowledge to create new products and services) becomes decisive.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius PIŢURLEA & Alina Georgiana IANCU & Dorin IANCU, 2013. "Romanian organizations to the new challenges of the knowledge society," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 197-212, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2013:i:2:piturlea
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_2_24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nurmi, Raimo, 1998. "Knowledge-intensive firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 26-32.
    2. George P. Huber, 1984. "The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(8), pages 928-951, August.
    3. Georg Von Krogh & Johan Roos & Ken Slocum, 1994. "An essay on corporate epistemology," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 53-71, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cmj:journl:y:2013:i:29:piturlea is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jin Li & Lulu Zhou & Xufan Zhang & Zhihong Chen & Feng Tian, 2018. "Technological Configuration Capability, Strategic Flexibility, and Organizational Performance in Chinese High-Tech Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Zhong, Weiguo & Peng, Jisheng & Liu, Chunlin, 2013. "Internationalization performance of Chinese multinational companies in the developed markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2479-2484.
    4. Bergeron, François & Raymond, Louis & Rivard, Suzanne, 2001. "Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-142, April.
    5. Amélie Artis & Simon Cornée, 2013. "Transformation informationnelle, certification et intermédiation financière : le cas de la banque solidaire," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201326, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    6. Tibosch, M.J.M.H. & Heng, M.S.H., 1992. "Information systems in the context of organizational culture," Serie Research Memoranda 0026, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Richard Thomas Watson & Kirk Plangger & Leyland Pitt & Amrit Tiwana, 2023. "A Theory of Information Compression: When Judgments Are Costly," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1089-1108, September.
    8. Simge Tuna & Stefano Brusoni & Anja Schulze, 2019. "Architectural knowledge generation: evidence from a field study," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(5), pages 977-1009.
    9. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Julie Battilana, 2011. "The Enabling Role of Social Position in Diverging from the Institutional Status Quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 817-834, August.
    11. Norman, Patricia M., 2004. "Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 610-619, June.
    12. Kent D. Miller & Shu-Jou Lin, 2010. "Different Truths in Different Worlds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 97-114, February.
    13. Bernard C. Y. Tan & Kwok-Kee Wei & Richard T. Watson & Danial L. Clapper & Ephraim R. McLean, 1998. "Computer-Mediated Communication and Majority Influence: Assessing the Impact in an Individualistic and a Collectivistic Culture," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(9), pages 1263-1278, September.
    14. Michalisin, Michael D., 2001. "Validity of annual report assertions about innovativeness: an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 151-161, September.
    15. Noé Chávez Hernández & Guillermo Torres Sanabria, 2012. "La organización inteligente en un ambiente de aprendizaje: una exploración de sus aspectos generales," Revista Ad-Minister, Universidad EAFIT, October.
    16. Matzler, Kurt & Renzl, Birgit & Müller, Julia & Herting, Stephan & Mooradian, Todd A., 2008. "Personality traits and knowledge sharing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 301-313, June.
    17. CHIRIMBU, Sebastian, 2014. "Challenges Of Leadership In Modern Organizations: Knowledge, Vision, Values," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 5(3), pages 39-47.
    18. Cepeda, Gabriel & Vera, Dusya, 2007. "Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 426-437, May.
    19. Andreeva, Tatiana E. & Yurtaikin, Evgeniy E. & Soltitskaya, Tatiana A., 2006. "Human resources development practices as a key tool to attract, motivate and retain knowledge workers," Working Papers 782, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    20. Jahangir Karimi & Toni M. Somers & Yash P. Gupta, 2004. "Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction with Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 175-193, June.
    21. Sandra Charreire-Petit & Isabelle Huault, 2008. "From practice-based knowledge to the practice of research : Revisiting constructivist research works on Knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00150763, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge; sustainable development; competitiveness; strategy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2013:i:2:piturlea. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.