IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/journl/y2015i7p21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romanian Family Between Traditions And Modernism

Author

Listed:
  • Raluca MARDARE

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi PhD Fellow SOP HRD/159/1.5/133675 Project, Romanian Academy Iasi Branch)

Abstract

Families and living arrangements have changed dramatically since the 1960s in the majority of European countries. Family life and the meaning of family have undergone a profound change. Relationships between partners or spouses, but also the relationships between parents and their children, have moved away from the realm of normative control and institutional canons, into the ideal of reflexive ‘pure relationships’ based on mutual consent and the recognition of individual autonomy. Following the collapse of communism, Romania has experienced dramatic changes in family formation. Common patterns include delays and/or declines in marriage and fertility, increasing rates of cohabitation and non-marital childbearing, rising rates of divorce. This paper aims to document the main stages of the evolution of marital behaviours in Romania from the traditional family of the 19th century to present days.

Suggested Citation

  • Raluca MARDARE, 2015. "Romanian Family Between Traditions And Modernism," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 21-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2015:i:7:p:21-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/CMJ2015_I1_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornelia Muresan & Paul-Teodor Hărăguş & Mihaela Hărăguş & Christin Schröder, 2008. "Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(23), pages 855-906.
    2. Brie, Mircea, 2005. "O istorie socială a spaţiului românesc. De la începuturile statalităţii dacice până la întrezărirea modernităţii [A Social History of Romanian Space. From the Beginning of Dacian state until the ri," MPRA Paper 44567, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2005.
    3. Larry Bumpass, 1990. "What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 27(4), pages 483-498, November.
    4. Tomáš Sobotka & Kryštof Zeman & Vladimíra Kantorová, 2003. "Demographic Shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A Second Demographic Transition View," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 249-277, September.
    5. Brie, Mircea, 2008. "Concubinajul – formă a erodării şi disoluţiei familiei în spaţiul Crişanei (începutul secolului XX) [Common-law Marriage – Means of Erosion and Dissolution of the Family in the Crisana Area (beginn," MPRA Paper 44185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Ruggles, 2015. "Patriarchy, Power, and Pay: The Transformation of American Families, 1800–2015," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(6), pages 1797-1823, December.
    2. Júlia Mikolai & Ann Berrington & Brienna Perelli-Harris, 2018. "The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(27), pages 753-794.
    3. Alicia Adsera, 2006. "An Economic Analysis of the Gap Between Desired and Actual Fertility: The Case of Spain," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 75-95, March.
    4. Tomáš Sobotka, 2008. "Overview Chapter 6: The diverse faces of the Second Demographic Transition in Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(8), pages 171-224.
    5. Audrey Light & Manuelita Ureta, 2003. "Living Arrangements, Employment Status, and the Economic Well-Being of Mothers: Evidence from Brazil, Chile and the United States," Working Papers 03-06, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Grzenda Wioletta & Frątczak Ewa, 2018. "Cohort Patterns Of Fertility In Poland Based On Staging Process – Generations 1930-1980," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 19(2), pages 315-330, June.
    7. Alicia Adsera, 2011. "Where Are the Babies? Labor Market Conditions and Fertility in Europe [Où sont les bébés ? Conditions du marché du travail et fécondité en Europe]," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 27(1), pages 1-32, February.
    8. Charles Strohm & Judith Seltzer & Susan Cochran & Vickie Mays, 2009. ""Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(7), pages 177-214.
    9. Daniela Kuruczova & Jana Klanova & Jiri Jarkovsky & Hynek Pikhart & Julie Bienertova-Vasku, 2020. "Socioeconomic characteristics, family structure and trajectories of children’s psychosocial problems in a period of social transition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Stewart, Charles Jr., 2006. "Gross national accumulation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 105-113.
    11. Adsera, Alicia, 2004. "Marital Fertility and Religion: Recent Changes in Spain," IZA Discussion Papers 1399, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. S Davies Withers, 1998. "Linking Household Transitions and Housing Transitions: A Longitudinal Analysis of Renters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 615-630, April.
    13. Guy Moors, 2003. "Estimating the Reciprocal Effect of Gender Role Attitudes and Family Formation: A Log-linear Path Model with Latent Variables," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 199-221, June.
    14. Michael S. Pollard & Kathleen Mullan Harris, 2013. "Cohabitation and Marriage Intensity Consolidation, Intimacy, and Commitment," Working Papers WR-1001, RAND Corporation.
    15. Cornelia Muresan & Jan M. Hoem, 2010. "The negative educational gradients in Romanian fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 22(4), pages 95-114.
    16. David Coleman, 2004. "Why we don't have to believe without doubting in the "Second Demographic Transition" - some agnostic comments," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 2(1), pages 11-24.
    17. Xiana Bueno & Ignacio Pardo, 2023. "Gender-role attitudes and fertility ideals in Latin America," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Robert Schoen & Robin Weinick, 1993. "The slowing metabolism of marriage: Figures from 1988 U.S. marital status life tables," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 30(4), pages 737-746, November.
    19. Brienna Perelli-Harris & Michaela R. Kreyenfeld & Wendy Sigle-Rushton & Renske Keizer & Trude Lappegård & Aiva Jasilioniene & Caroline Berghammer & Paola Di Giulio & Katja Köppen, 2009. "The increase in fertility in cohabitation across Europe: examining the intersection between union status and childbearing," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    20. Pau Baizán & Arnstein Aassve & Francesco C. Billari, 2003. "Cohabitation, Marriage, and First Birth: The Interrelationship of Family Formation Events in Spain," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 147-169, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marriage; Family; Second Demographic transition; Traditionalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J10 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - General
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2015:i:7:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.