IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/commun/v10y2018i5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do we Boost Employment Outcomes for Neurodiverse Albertans?

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Dunn

    (University of Calgary)

  • Krystle Wittevrongel

    (University of Calgary)

  • Jennifer Zwicker

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

Despite the supports that have been put in place, Canadians with developmental disabilities (DD) continue to face obstacles in gaining and maintaining employment. In 2012 two out of three Canadians with DD were out of the workforce and not looking for a job. This dismal statistic means that a large number of capable people are chronically unemployed, a situation that leads to poorer quality of life, with accompanying declines in cognitive function and general well-being. For these neurodiverse Canadians, the cascading effects of unemployment include financial insecurity, poor self-esteem, less ability to live independently and lower community participation. For employers, it means that a pool of diverse talent and resources that would benefit their companies is untapped. Of all disabilities, Canadians with DD face the worst employment levels. Educating employers about neurodiversity and incentivising them to make accommodations in hiring practices and in the workplace would go far toward reducing the number of jobless neurodiverse people. As a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Canada is expected to provide inclusive and accessible job training, education and labour market opportunities. Yet, labour market activation programs, welfare reforms and equality laws have so far failed to make a difference in the unemployment numbers. A recent study reveals that the top three barriers to unemployment for neurodiverse Albertans include employers’ knowledge, attitude, capacity and management practices; a late start to the concept of work among people with DD; and the stigma of their disability. Programs to remedy the situation abound at the federal and provincial levels and lately, the focus has been shifted to employer education initiatives. Much remains to be done, however, and this communiqué offers suggestions for policy changes that may benefit all parties concerned. One policy could entail changing the design of income assistance programs like Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped (AISH) to remove disincentives to work, such as ensuring continued access to important health benefits. Governments could also offer financial incentives such as wage subsidies and tax credits to employers who hire neurodiverse people, as well as provide monetary incentives for neurodiverse Canadians who wish to be self-employed. Training programs could be available for employers to teach them the value of having a diverse workforce, as well as instructing them in how their companies can become inclusive and accessible. Putting the proper supports in place in the early years would assist neurodiverse high-school youth to participate in career planning, work internships and job training. Helping Canada’s neurodiverse population to get and keep jobs provides benefits to the economy in terms of increased GDP, to employers in terms of talent and ability, and to people with DD who will enjoy a higher quality of life, greater self-esteem and reduced stigma and isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Dunn & Krystle Wittevrongel & Jennifer Zwicker, 2018. "How do we Boost Employment Outcomes for Neurodiverse Albertans?," SPP Communique, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 10(5), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:commun:v:10:y:2018:i:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Employment-Outcomes-Dunn-Wittevrongel-Zwicker-final2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ilo:ilowps:447563 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Buckup, Sebastian., 2009. "The price of exclusion : the economic consequences of excluding people with disabilities from the world of work," ILO Working Papers 994475633402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Carolyn Dudley & David B. Nicholas & Jennifer D. Zwicker, 2015. "What do we know about Improving Employment Outcomes for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder?," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 8(32), September.
    4. Metts, Robert L., 2000. "Disability issues, trends and recommendations for the World Bank," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 23068, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brown, Suzana & Vairis, Achilles & Masoumifar, Ali M. & Petousis, Markos, 2020. "Common problems with the conventional design of crutches: Proposing a safer design and discussing the potential impact," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Powers, Tony., 2008. "Recognizing ability : the skills and productivity of persons with disabilities: literature review," ILO Working Papers 994131063402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Dominic Fritz & Ursula Miller & Andreas Gude & Andreas Pruisken & Dorothea Rischewski, 2009. "Making poverty reduction inclusive: Experiences from Cambodia, Tanzania and Vietnam," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(5), pages 673-684.
    4. Mary Wickenden & Philip Mader & Stephen Thompson & Jackie Shaw, 2022. "Mainstreaming disability inclusive employment in international development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), pages 933-941, July.
    5. Cámara Angeles & Martínez Mª Isabel & Santero-Sánchez Rosa, 2020. "Macroeconomic cost of excluding persons with disabilities from the workforce in Spain," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Becker, Charles M. & Merkuryeva, Irina S., 2012. "Disability incidence and official health status transitions in Russia," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 74-88.
    7. Gregor Wolbring & Rachel Mackay & Theresa Rybchinski & Jacqueline Noga, 2013. "Disabled People and the Post-2015 Development Goal Agenda through a Disability Studies Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-31, September.
    8. Ute Rink & Theresa Rollwage, 2022. "Household disability and time preferences: Evidence from incentivized experiments in Vietnam," TVSEP Working Papers wp-027, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Project TVSEP.
    9. Crăciun Ionuț-Marius, 2020. "Study On The Evolution Of The Number Of People With Disabilities In Romania," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(48), pages 71-86, August.
    10. repec:ilo:ilowps:487920 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Prashant Loyalka & Lan Liu & Gong Chen & Xiaoying Zheng, 2014. "The Cost of Disability in China," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(1), pages 97-118, February.
    12. Hang'andu, Privilege & Mensah, Emmanuel Kodwo & Nikolova, Elena & Hayward, Elizabeth, 2023. "Educating children with disabilities: Comparative evidence from Ethiopia, Burkina Faso and Niger," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1289, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Andrew Griffiths & Stevens Bechange & Hannah Loryman & Chris Iga & Elena Schmidt, 2020. "How Do Legal and Policy Frameworks Support Employment of People With Disabilities in Uganda? Findings From a Qualitative Policy Analysis Study," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1360-1378, November.
    14. Andrews Amenyo, 2022. "Leveraging the Socio-Economic Status of Persons With Disabilities Through Employment," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 9(1), pages 94-122.
    15. Matthew C. Saleh & Susanne M. Bruyère, 2018. "Leveraging Employer Practices in Global Regulatory Frameworks to Improve Employment Outcomes for People with Disabilities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 18-28.
    16. Andrés Martínez-Medina & Sonia Morales-Calvo & Vicenta Rodríguez-Martín & Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2022. "Sixteen Years since the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: What Have We Learned since Then?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Luther Lebogang Monareng & Shaheed Mogammad Soeker & Deshini Naidoo, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Evidence‐based frameworks used to promote self‐employment with persons with disabilities: A scoping review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    18. Axmann, Michael. & Rhoades, Amy. & Nordstrum, Lee E. & La Rue, Josée-Anne. & Byusa, Michelle., 2015. "Vocational teachers and trainers in a changing world : the imperative of high-quality teacher training systems," ILO Working Papers 994879203402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. María-José Calderón-Milán & Beatriz Calderón-Milán & Virginia Barba-Sánchez, 2020. "Labour Inclusion of People with Disabilities: What Role Do the Social and Solidarity Economy Entities Play?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Merkuryeva Irina, 2007. "The system of disability benefits in Russia. Estimation of targeting accuracy," EERC Working Paper Series 07-04e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    21. Michael Palmer & Nora Groce & Daniel Mont & Oanh Hong Nguyen & Sophie Mitra, 2015. "The Economic Lives of People with Disabilities in Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:commun:v:10:y:2018:i:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.