IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v74y2021i10p26-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Steuern und Innovation: Wie steuerliche FuE-Förderung Innovationsanreize in privatwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen schafft

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Falck
  • Anna Kerkhof
  • Christian Pfaffl
  • Christian Pfaffl

Abstract

Innovationen bilden die Grundlage für technischen Fortschritt und haben einen entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Zukunftsfähigkeit von Volkswirtschaften. Positive Externalitäten sowie das inhärente Risiko von Investitionen in Forschung und Entwicklung (FuE) führen jedoch dazu, dass privatwirtschaftliche Investitionen in FuE im Marktgleichgewicht unterhalb des effizienten Niveaus liegen. Der Staat kann dieses Marktversagen kompensieren, indem er gezielte Anreize für Innovationen setzt. Dazu stehen verschiedene steuerpolitische Instrumente zur Verfügung: Man unterscheidet zwischen gezielter steuerlicher FuE-Förderung (input- oder outputbasiert) und allgemeiner steuerlicher Förderung über die Unternehmens- und Einkommensbesteuerung. Im Rahmen eines Evidenzberichts mit Meta-Analyse wurde die existierende Fachliteratur zur Wirkung steuerlicher FuE-Förderung systematisch ausgewertet. Die Analyse zeichnet ein überwiegend positives Bild hinsichtlich der gewünschten Wirksamkeit steuerlicher FuE-Förderung. Insbesondere die gezielte, inputbasierte steuerliche FuE-Förderung und die allgemeine Förderung durch Unternehmensteuern zeigen eine positive Wirkung auf Innovationen bzw. FuE-Aktivitäten in privatwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Falck & Anna Kerkhof & Christian Pfaffl & Christian Pfaffl, 2021. "Steuern und Innovation: Wie steuerliche FuE-Förderung Innovationsanreize in privatwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen schafft," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(10), pages 26-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:74:y:2021:i:10:p:26-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2021-10-falck-kerkhof-pfaffl-steuern-innovation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwab, Thomas & Todtenhaupt, Maximilian, 2021. "Thinking outside the box: The cross-border effect of tax cuts on R&D," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Shao, Yuchen & Xiao, Chengrui, 2019. "Corporate tax policy and heterogeneous firm innovation: Evidence from a developing country," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 470-486.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gundert Hannah & Nicolay Katharina & Steinbrenner Daniela & Wickel Sophia, 2024. "The Tax Attractiveness of EU Locations for Corporate Investments: A Stocktaking of Past Developments and Recent Reforms," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 97-132.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Falck & Anna Kerkhof & Christian Pfaffl, 2021. "Taxation and Innovation," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 123, July.
    2. Dai, Xiaoyong & Wang, Mengqi, 2024. "Unintended effects of tax incentives on firms’ strategic patenting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 1-24.
    3. Kong, Dongmin & Zhang, Bohui & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "Higher education and corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Guo, Fenghua & Huo, Peiyun & Song, Hui & Zhang, Duolei & Zhou, Lei, 2024. "Does tax symmetry improve corporate innovation investment? Evidence from the change policy of loss carrying forward period in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 591-602.
    5. Katarzyna Bilicka & Michael Devereux & Irem Güçeri, 2023. "Tax-Avoidance Networks and the Push for a “Historic” Global Tax Reform," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(1), pages 57-108.
    6. Wan, Qunchao & Chen, Jin & Yao, Zhu & Yuan, Ling, 2022. "Preferential tax policy and R&D personnel flow for technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industry in an emerging economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Wang, Ting & Zhang, Yi & Liu, Chun, 2024. "Robot adoption and employment adjustment: Firm-level evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Rongxin Xu & Yibai Yang & Zhijie Zheng, 2024. "Intellectual property rights, taxation, and firms’ innovation: theory and evidence from China," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 81-109, June.
    9. Marko Köthenbürger & Federica Liberini & Michael Stimmelmayr, 2018. "Is it just Luring Reported Profit? The Case of European Patent Boxes," CESifo Working Paper Series 7061, CESifo.
    10. Liu, Guanchun & Liu, Hangjuan & Liu, Yuanyuan & Yang, Jinyu & Zhang, Yanren, 2024. "Personal income tax and corporate innovation: The key role of inventors’ financial incentives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. İrem Güçeri & Marko Köthenbürger & Martin Simmler, 2020. "Supporting Firm Innovation and R&D: What is the Optimal Policy Mix?," EconPol Policy Reports 20, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    12. Marko Koethenbuerger & Federica Liberini & Michael Stimmelmayr, 2019. "(Un)Intended Effects of Preferential Tax Regimes: The Case of European Patent Boxes," EconPol Working Paper 29, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    13. Bronwyn H. Hall, 2020. "Tax Policy for Innovation," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation and Public Policy, pages 151-188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Robert S. Chirinko & Daniel J. Wilson, 2022. "Fiscal Policies for Job Creation and Innovation: The Experiences of US States," CESifo Working Paper Series 10158, CESifo.
    15. Ronald B. Davies & Dieter Franz Kogler & Ryan M. Hynes, 2020. "Patent Boxes and the Success Rate of Applications," Working Papers 202018, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    16. Haufler, Andreas & Schindler, Dirk, 2023. "Attracting profit shifting or fostering innovation? On patent boxes and R&D subsidies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Wasiluk Dorota & Białek-Jaworska Anna, 2020. "Determinants of corporate R&D expenditures: the role of taxes," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 7(54), pages 110-126, January.
    18. Zhang, Yi & Wang, Ting & Liu, Chun, 2024. "Beyond the modern productivity paradox: The effect of robotics technology on firm-level total factor productivity in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Zhang, Jianhong & Jiang, Jiangang, 2024. "Investment deregulation and innovation performance of Chinese private firms," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Huang, Wen & Wu, Ying & Deng, Li, 2021. "Does banking competition stimulate regional innovation? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Forschungsfinanzierung; Steuervergünstigung; Unternehmensbesteuerung; Steuerpolitik; Wirkungsanalyse;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:74:y:2021:i:10:p:26-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.