IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v72y2019i06p34-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der Kohleausstieg bis 2038 – wie bewerten Ökonomen die Empfehlungen der Kohlekommission?

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Blum
  • Philip Kapitzke
  • Niklas Potrafke

Abstract

Das 22. Ökonomenpanel vom ifo Institut und der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung widmet sich dem Thema Kohleausstieg. In der Februar-Umfrage wurden Professoren für Volkswirtschaftslehre an deutschen Universitäten befragt, wie sie die Vorschläge der sogenannten Kohlekommission zum Kohleausstieg Deutschlands bewerten – vor allem im Hinblick auf die ökonomischen Konsequenzen. Die befragten Wirtschaftswissenschaftler sehen den Kohleausstieg zum großen Teil skeptisch, wenn er auch von einigen Ökonomen als unumgänglich bezeichnet wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Blum & Philip Kapitzke & Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Der Kohleausstieg bis 2038 – wie bewerten Ökonomen die Empfehlungen der Kohlekommission?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(06), pages 34-39, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:06:p:34-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2019-06-blum-kapitzke-potrafke-oekonomenpanel-kohleausstieg-2019-03-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Blum & Raphael de Britto Schiller & Andreas Löschel & Johannes Pfeiffer & Karen Pittel & Niklas Potrafke & Alex Schmitt, 2019. "Zur Bepreisung von CO2-Emissionen – Ergebnisse aus dem Ökonomenpanel," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(16), pages 60-65, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Kohle; Kohlepolitik; Energiemarkt; Fossile Energie; Klimaschutz;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:06:p:34-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.