IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v69y2016i20p45-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hillary Clinton oder Donald Trump – wer wird der bessere US-Präsident?

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Dorn
  • Manuela Krause
  • Philipp Meier
  • Niklas Potrafke

Abstract

In der September-Umfrage des Ökonomenpanels von ifo und FAZ wurden Professoren für Volkswirtschaftslehre an deutschen Universitäten zu der bevorstehenden Präsidentschaftswahl in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika befragt. Die große Mehrheit der Teilnehmer würde dabei Hillary Clinton als Präsidentin wählen. Von einer Präsidentschaft Clintons erwarten die Teilnehmer im Vergleich zur Alternative Trump auch mehrheitlich bessere ökonomische sowie politische Impulse.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Dorn & Manuela Krause & Philipp Meier & Niklas Potrafke, 2016. "Hillary Clinton oder Donald Trump – wer wird der bessere US-Präsident?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(20), pages 45-50, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:20:p:45-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2016-20-krause-etal-oekonomenpanel_wahl-usa-2016-10-27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorine Boumans & Florian Dorn & Stefanie Gäbler & Björn Kauder & Manuela Krause & Andreas Peichl & Niklas Potrafke, 2017. "Ein Jahr nach der Wahl: Welche Auswirkungen hat die Präsidentschaft Trumps auf Wirtschaft und Politik?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(23), pages 35-41, December.
    2. Hoda Aboushanab & Klaus Gründler & Niklas Potrafke & Fabian Ruthardt & Jannik Sielmann, 2020. "Ökonomenpanel: Hoffnungsträger Biden," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(12), pages 40-43, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Präsidentschaftswahl; Panel; Ökonomen; USA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:20:p:45-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.