IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v62y2009i14p16-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Umweltinnovationen und Umweltpatente in Deutschland – erste empirische Ergebnisse

Author

Listed:
  • Tilmann Rave

Abstract

Um die Bestimmungsgründe, Ausbreitungsmechanismen und Wirkungen von Umweltinnovationen zu erklären, wurde bisher stark auf einzelnen Fallstudien abgestellt. Um die Forschung auf eine neue und breitere Grundlage zu stellen, führt das ifo Institut derzeit eine Studie zu Entstehung, Diffusion und Wirkungen von Umwelt- bzw. Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen durch, die mit Hilfe einer branchenübergreifenden Unternehmensbefragung und einer Patentanalyse auf der Basis der Datenbank des Europäischen Patentamts innovations- und umweltbezogene Informationen gewinnt. In dem Beitrag wird ein Überblick über die bislang erzielten empirischen Ergebnisse gegeben. Es zeigte sich z.B., dass bei allen Innovationstypen die Innovationsneigung mit der Größe des Unternehmens zunimmt, große Unternehmen also von Skaleneffekten profitieren oder zumindest häufiger innovieren als kleine. Auffällig ist im Hinblick auf ökologisch bedeutsamste Innovation, dass diese in zwei Drittel aller Fälle sehr stark oder stark von zurückliegenden Innovationstätigkeiten begünstigt wird. Bezüglich der Art der Umweltentlastungen überwiegt schließlich die Verringerung der CO2-Emissionen und des Energieverbrauchs andere Arten von Umweltentlastungen.

Suggested Citation

  • Tilmann Rave, 2009. "Umweltinnovationen und Umweltpatente in Deutschland – erste empirische Ergebnisse," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(14), pages 16-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:14:p:16-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2009_14_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rennings, Klaus & Ziegler, Andreas & Ankele, Kathrin & Hoffmann, Esther, 2006. "The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 45-59, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ehrenfeld, Wilfried, 2012. "Climate Innovation - The Case of the Central German Chemical Industry," IWH Discussion Papers 2/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    2. Kube, Roland & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Löschel, Andreas & Massier, Philipp, 2019. "Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    3. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Joana Costa, 2021. "Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Qunli Wu & Xinxin Xu & Ye Tian, 2022. "Research on enterprises emission reduction technology innovation strategies with government subsidy and carbon trading mechanism," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2083-2097, September.
    6. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Spatial Dynamics between Firm Sales and Environmental Responsibility: The Mediating Role of Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Ruzhi Xu & Tingting Guo & Huawei Zhao, 2022. "Research on the Path of Policy Financing Guarantee to Promote SMEs’ Green Technology Innovation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. António Pedro Vieira & Gregor Radonjič, 2020. "Disclosure of eco‐innovation activities in European large companies' sustainability reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2240-2253, September.
    9. Dewick, Paul & Maytorena-Sanchez, Eunice & Winch, Graham, 2019. "Regulation and regenerative eco-innovation: the case of extracted materials in the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 38-51.
    10. Jianhua Yin & Sen Wang, 2018. "The effects of corporate environmental disclosure on environmental innovation from stakeholder perspectives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 905-919, February.
    11. Salvatore Zappalà & Luca Radassao & Ferdinando Toscano, 2023. "Greening Organizations: The Relationship between Employee Environmental Concern, Perception of Advantages of Eco-Innovations, and Support for Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-12, December.
    12. De Marchi, Valentina, 2012. "Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 614-623.
    13. Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio & Céspedes-Lorente, José, 2008. "Environmental spillover effects on firm productivity and efficiency: An analysis of agri-food business in Southeast Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 131-139, August.
    14. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2019. "Academic Inventors and the Antecedents of Green Technologies. A Regional Analysis of Italian Patent Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 247-263.
    15. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Palma, Alessandro, 2017. "Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 799-819.
    16. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2022. "The rationale for ISO 14001 certification: A systematic review and a cost–benefit analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1067-1083, July.
    17. Sun, Yunpeng & Razzaq, Asif & Sun, Huaping & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "The asymmetric influence of renewable energy and green innovation on carbon neutrality in China: Analysis from non-linear ARDL model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 334-343.
    18. Fabio Montobbio & Ilaria Solito, 2018. "Does the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme Foster Innovation in European Firms?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 82-99, January.
    19. Fleiter, Tobias & Schleich, Joachim & Ravivanpong, Ployplearn, 2012. "Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 863-875.
    20. Meleddu, Marta & Vecco, Marilena & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2024. "The Role of Voluntary Environmental Policies Towards Achieving Circularity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Umweltpolitik; Innovation; Patent; Umweltforschung; Unternehmen; Deutschland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q29 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Other
    • Q31 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q34 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Natural Resources and Domestic and International Conflicts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:14:p:16-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.