IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v61y2008i14p14-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struktur und Entwicklungspotential der Photovoltaikindustrie in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Volker Ruhl
  • Johann Wackerbauer

Abstract

In den letzten Jahren hat die Photovoltaikindustrie in Deutschland, vorangetrieben von der klimapolitischen Zielsetzung der Bundesregierung und begünstigt durch die hohen Einspeisevergütungen für Solarstrom nach dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz, ein rasantes Wachstum erlebt. Viele Staaten setzen auf den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien, und die meisten EU-Mitgliedsländer fördern sie durch Einspeisevergütungen ähnlich dem deutschen Modell, woraus sich erhebliche Exportpotentiale für die deutsche Solarindustrie ergeben. Aus Sicht der Photovoltaikunternehmen wird sich die Entwicklung auch in den kommenden Jahren fortsetzen. Die im Vergleich zum Westen strukturschwachen Regionen in Ostdeutschland konnten sich als Standorte vor allem der Hersteller etablieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Volker Ruhl & Johann Wackerbauer, 2008. "Struktur und Entwicklungspotential der Photovoltaikindustrie in Deutschland," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(14), pages 14-28, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:14:p:14-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2008_14_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Frondel/ Nolan Ritter/ Christoph M. Schmidt, 2008. "Photovoltaik: Wo viel Licht ist, ist auch viel Schatten," List Forum Chapter, in: List Gesellschaft e.V. (ed.), List Forum Band 34, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 28 - 44, List Gesellschaft e.V..
    2. Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer, 2010. "Die Umweltwirtschaft in Bayern," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(23), pages 33-41, December.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt & Susanne Prantl, 2009. "The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(1), pages 20-32, February.
    4. repec:zbw:rwipos:018 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joachim Ragnitz & Heinz Schmalholz & Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer & Frank Kapol, 2009. "Cleantech in Ostdeutschland : Bestandsaufnahme und Entwicklungsperspektiven," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 49, May.
    2. Johann Wackerbauer & Jana Lippelt, 2012. "Kurz zum Klima: Solarstromboom mit Nebenwirkungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(03), pages 31-34, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carreira, Carlos & Teixeira, Paulino, 2011. "Entry and exit as a source of aggregate productivity growth in two alternative technological regimes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 135-150, June.
    2. Flach, Lisandra & Gräf, Fabian, 2020. "The impact of trade agreements on world export prices," Munich Reprints in Economics 70372, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    3. Florin Maican & Matilda Orth, 2017. "Productivity Dynamics and the Role of ‘Big-Box’ Entrants in Retailing," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 397-438, June.
    4. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik & Schneller, Olivier, 2010. "Optimal Mix of Applied and Basic Research, Distance to Frontier, and Openness," CEPR Discussion Papers 7795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Renaud Bourlès & Gilbert Cette & Jimmy Lopez & Jacques Mairesse & Giuseppe Nicoletti, 2013. "Do Product Market Regulations In Upstream Sectors Curb Productivity Growth? Panel Data Evidence For OECD Countries," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1750-1768, December.
    6. Marina Rybalka, 2015. "The innovative input mix. Assessing the importance of R&D and ICT investments for firm performance in manufacturing and services," Discussion Papers 801, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    7. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    8. Max Nathan & Anna Rosso, 2017. "Innovative events," Development Working Papers 429, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 08 Apr 2019.
    9. Sarra Ben Yahmed & Sean Dougherty, 2012. "Import Competition, Domestic Regulation and Firm-Level Productivity Growth in the OECD," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 980, OECD Publishing.
    10. Duso, Tomaso & Seldeslachts, Jo & Szucs, Florian, 2019. "The Impact of Competition Policy Enforcement on the Functioning of EU Energy Markets," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 40(01), pages 97-120.
    11. Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.
    12. Rufei Ma & Xu He & Xin Xiang, 2022. "Cross‐listing on the Hong Kong Exchange and Chinese firm innovation: New evidence," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 365-393, June.
    13. Baiker, Laura & Bertola, Elena & Jelitto, Markus, 2021. "Services Domestic Regulation - Locking in good regulatory practices: Analyzing the prevalence of Services Domestic Regulation disciplines and their potential linkages with economic performance," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2021-14, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    14. Magnus Henrekson & Mikael Stenkula, 2017. "The entrepreneurial rent: the value of and compensation for entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 11-25, April.
    15. Benavente, Jose Miguel & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2021. "How does market competition affect firm innovation incentives in emerging countries? Evidence from Latin American firms," MERIT Working Papers 2021-024, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Philipp Weinscheink, 2010. "Entry and Incumbent Innovation," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010_17, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    17. Viktoria Kocsis & Victoria Shestalova & Henry van der Wiel & Nick Zubanov & Ruslan Lukach & Bert Minne, 2009. "Relation entry, exit and productivity: an overview of recent theoretical and empirical literature," CPB Document 180.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    18. Fabiano Schivardi & Eliana Viviano, 2007. "Entry barriers in Italian retail trade," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 616, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Fougère, D. & Golfier, C. & Horny, G. & Kremp, E., 2013. "What has been the impact of the 2008 crisis on firms’ default? (in French)," Working papers 463, Banque de France.
    20. Henry van der Wiel & Harold Creusen & George van Leeuwen & Eugene Van der Pijll, 2012. "The Dutch Productivity Performance: Cross Your Border and Look Around," Chapters, in: Matilde Mas & Robert Stehrer (ed.), Industrial Productivity in Europe, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Photovoltaikanlage; Elektriziätswirtschaft; Regenerative Energie; Deutschland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:14:p:14-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.