IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifofor/v14y2013i01p29-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability of Banking System in Poland and Activity of the KNF – Polish Financial Supervision Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Bartosz Godziszewski
  • Michal Kruszka

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartosz Godziszewski & Michal Kruszka, 2013. "Stability of Banking System in Poland and Activity of the KNF – Polish Financial Supervision Authority," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(01), pages 29-34, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:14:y:2013:i:01:p:29-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/forum1-13-focus5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristiano Cantore & Paul Levine & Giovanni Melina, 2014. "A Fiscal Stimulus and Jobless Recovery," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 116(3), pages 669-701, July.
    2. Mr. Martin Cihak & Richard Podpiera, 2006. "Is One Watchdog Better Than Three? International Experience with Integrated Financial Sector Supervision," IMF Working Papers 2006/057, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Martin Èihák & Richard Podpiera, 2006. "Is One Watchdog Better than Three? International Experience with Integrated Financial-Sector Supervision (in English)," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 56(3-4), pages 102-126, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartosz Godziszewski & Michal Kruszka, 2013. "Stability of Banking System in Poland and Activity of the KNF – Polish Financial Supervision Authority," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(1), pages 29-34, May.
    2. Cihák, Martin & Podpiera, Richard, 2008. "Integrated financial supervision: Which model?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 135-152, August.
    3. Buklemishev, O. & Danilov, Yu., 2013. "Effective Financial Regulation and Creation of the Mega-Regulator in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 82-98.
    4. Mertzanis, Charilaos, 2020. "Financial supervision structure, decentralized decision-making and financing constraints," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 13-37.
    5. Petr Musílek, 2006. "Comparison Models of the Financial Regulation and Supervision: Advantages and Disadvantages [Komparace modelů finanční regulace a dozoru: výhody a nevýhody]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(4), pages 8-22.
    6. Melecky, Martin & Podpiera, Anca Maria, 2013. "Institutional structures of financial sector supervision, their drivers and historical benchmarks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 428-444.
    7. Estrada, Dairo Ayiber & Gutiérrez R., Javier, 2009. "Supervisión y regulación del sistema financiero: modelos, implicaciones y alcances," Perfil de Coyuntura Económica, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE, August.
    8. Masahiro Kawai & Michael Pomerleano, 2012. "Strengthening Systemic Financial Regulation," Chapters, in: Masahiro Kawai & David G. Mayes & Peter Morgan (ed.), Implications of the Global Financial Crisis for Financial Reform and Regulation in Asia, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Masahiro Kawai & Michael Pomerleano, 2011. "Regulating Systemic Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Asli Demirgüç-Kunt & Douglas D Evanoff & George G Kaufman (ed.), The International Financial Crisis Have the Rules of Finance Changed?, chapter 10, pages 127-153, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Benjamin M. Cole & Preeta M. Banerjee, 2010. "Unitary regulatory supervision or multi‐entity supervision? A computational approach to a numbers problem in financial regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(4), pages 435-464, December.
    11. Kenneth Sullivan, 2008. "Presentación proactiva del desempeño," Boletín, CEMLA, vol. 0(3), pages 130-135, Julio-sep.
    12. Ovidiu Stoica & Delia-Elena DiaconaÅŸu, 2012. "Regional Economic Integration And National Financial Supervision. A Comparative Study," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-23.
    13. Jenny Corbett, 2007. "Financial Institutions and Structures for Growth in East Asia," EABER Working Papers 21858, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. Monkiewicz Jan, 2009. "Enterprise Management and Regulation of Economic Activity: The Case of Insurance," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 1(2), pages 129-142, January.
    15. Melanie S. Milo, 2007. "Integrated Financial Supervision : An Institutional Perspective for the Philippines," Finance Working Papers 22667, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    16. Francesc Trillas Jané, 2016. "Behavioral Regulatory Agencies," Working Papers wpdea1606, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    17. Martin Čihák & Alexander Tieman, 2011. "Quality of Financial Sector Regulation and Supervision Around the World," Chapters, in: Sylvester Eijffinger & Donato Masciandaro (ed.), Handbook of Central Banking, Financial Regulation and Supervision, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Milo, Melanie S., 2007. "Integrated Financial Supervision: an Institutional Perspective for the Philippines," Discussion Papers DP 2007-17, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    19. International Monetary Fund, 2007. "Israel: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2007/025, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Petr Musílek, 2008. "Institutional Arrangement of Financial Markets Supervision: The Case of the Czech Republic," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(4), pages 6-21.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Finanzmarkt; Bankensystem; Aufsichtsbehörde; Konjunkturpolitik; Polen;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:14:y:2013:i:01:p:29-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.