IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ceh/journl/y2019v4p43-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crises and Opportunities: Greek and Bulgarian Bourgeoisie and Muslim Merchants in the 19th Century Black Sea Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Can Guripek

    (Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, Department of Economic History, Turkey)

Abstract

In the 19th century, there were some crises in the Black Sea trade and some opportunities related to these crises. The monopoly power of the Ottoman Empire in the Black Sea trade was shared among other regional actors in the process that began with the 1774 Kucuk Kaynarca Agreement. The Russian Empire's start to trade in the Black Sea was a crisis for the Muslim Ottoman merchant in the region, but it was an opportunity for Greek sailors. In this crisis environment, the Muslim merchant has turned to the east, namely the Black Sea-Iran transit trade route. As a result of the crisis in the Black Sea, they turned to Iranian trade and seized an opportunity. As a result of the industrialization activities, the integration of the world economy made the Balkan geography important. The dominance of the Greeks in trade created a crisis for Bulgarian merchants. However, the political crises of the Ottoman Empire allowed the Bulgarian bourgeoisie to grow. The Bulgarian bourgeoisie maintained good relations with the Ottoman Empire for many years, and even tax collections on behalf of the Ottomans caused serious tensions between the bourgeoisie and the people. In this article, as in Schumpeter's crisis theory, it is tried to be explained that the 19th century Black Sea trade creates crises and opportunities. Classification-N83, N90, P12, P45

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Can Guripek, 2019. "Crises and Opportunities: Greek and Bulgarian Bourgeoisie and Muslim Merchants in the 19th Century Black Sea Trade," Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, Centre for Economic History Research, vol. 4, pages 43-51, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2019:v:4:p:43-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://csii.bg/series/2019-4/pdf/03-MustafaGuripek.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://csii.bg/series/2019-4/html/03-MustafaGuripek.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solimano, Andres, 2014. "Economic Elites, Crises, and Democracy: Alternatives Beyond Neoliberal Capitalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199355983.
    2. Michael D. Bordo, 2018. "Reflections on the Evolution of Financial Crises: Theory, History and Empirics," Studies in Economic History, in: Hugh Rockoff & Isao Suto (ed.), Coping with Financial Crises, chapter 0, pages 1-15, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaies, Brahim & Goutte, Stéphane & Guesmi, Khaled, 2019. "Banking crises in developing countries–What crucial role of exchange rate stability and external liabilities?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Bull, Benedicte & Robles Rivera, Francisco, 2020. "COVID-19, elites and the future political economy of inequality reduction in Latin America," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    3. Andrew Cumbers & Robert McMaster & Susana Cabaço & Michael J White, 2020. "Reconfiguring Economic Democracy: Generating New Forms of Collective Agency, Individual Economic Freedom and Public Participation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(4), pages 678-695, August.
    4. González-Bustamante, Bastián, 2019. "The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: A Case Study of the Chilean Executive During the Democratic Post-Transition," SocArXiv d52au, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2019:v:4:p:43-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Roussev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csiisbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.